RE: linux-next: Tree for July 17 (mfd/tps65217.c)

2012-08-21 Thread AnilKumar, Chimata
Hi Samuel, On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 23:21:37, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 08/05/2012 11:38 PM, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 22:58:01, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> On 07/17/2012 02:48 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> > >>> On 07/16/2012 10:41 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >>> >

Re: linux-next: Tree for July 17 (mfd/tps65217.c)

2012-08-21 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 08/05/2012 11:38 PM, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote: > On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 22:58:01, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 07/17/2012 02:48 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> >>> On 07/16/2012 10:41 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, Changes since 20120716: >>> >>> >>> on i386: >>> >>> drive

RE: linux-next: Tree for July 17 (mfd/tps65217.c)

2012-08-05 Thread AnilKumar, Chimata
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 22:58:01, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 07/17/2012 02:48 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > On 07/16/2012 10:41 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Changes since 20120716: > >> > > > > > > on i386: > > > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `tps65217_probe': > > t

Re: linux-next: Tree for July 17 (mfd/tps65217.c)

2012-08-03 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 07/17/2012 02:48 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 07/16/2012 10:41 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20120716: >> > > > on i386: > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `tps65217_probe': > tps65217.c:(.devinit.text+0x13e37): undefined reference to > `of_regulator_match'