Moin,
> -Original Message-
> From: mirabilos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 1:07 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Rogier Wolff
> Subject: Re: Sony Memory stick format funnies...
>
>
> Yn).
> > 04e30 00 00 00 00 00 00 4
I've seen something similar with USB memory stick devices... they don't
seem to report a media change in a way that the VFS layer will understand.
I think this deserves some _serious_ debugging, personally, as this is
going to come back to haunt us over and over again with some types of
memory st
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Rogier Wolff wrote:
> > The image of the disk (including partition table) is at:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.bitwizard.nl/misc_junk/formatted.img.gz
> >
> > It's 63kb and uncompresses to the 64Mb (almost) that it's sold as.
> >
>
> And on at least this kernel (2.4.0) th
Btw, the root dir contains 512 entries.
Just from the dump.
(I would let the partition start at sector ptabl+1, not wasting
so much space... but M$ fdisk.exe neither does.)
-mirabilos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROT
mirabilos wrote:
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> Btw, the root dir contains 512 entries.
> Just from the dump.
Jep.
> (I would let the partition start at sector ptabl+1, not wasting
> so much space... but M$ fdisk.exe neither does.)
This was formatted by my Sony DSC50
Rogier Wolff wrote:
>
> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I doubt the kernel is seeing it without it being there (it doesn't have
> > > > much imagination.) However, it may very well be there in a funny
> > > > manner. You do realize, of course, that it's pretty m
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> > >
> > > I doubt the kernel is seeing it without it being there (it doesn't have
> > > much imagination.) However, it may very well be there in a funny
> > > manner. You do realize, of course, that it's pretty much impossible for
> > > us to help
Rogier Wolff wrote:
> >
> > I doubt the kernel is seeing it without it being there (it doesn't have
> > much imagination.) However, it may very well be there in a funny
> > manner. You do realize, of course, that it's pretty much impossible for
> > us to help you answer that question without a c
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 01:09:22PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > Rogier Wolff wrote:
> > >
> > > H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > > > Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > By author:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rogier Wolff)
> > > > In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> > > > >
> >
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Rogier Wolff wrote:
> >
> > H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > > Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > By author:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rogier Wolff)
> > > In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> > > >
> > > > # l /mnt/d1
> > > > total 16
> > > > drwxr-xr-x 512 root root1638
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> >
> > I doubt the kernel is seeing it without it being there (it doesn't have
> > much imagination.) However, it may very well be there in a funny
> > manner. You do realize, of course, that it's pretty much impossible for
> > us to help you answer that question without
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 01:09:22PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Rogier Wolff wrote:
> >
> > H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > > Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > By author:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rogier Wolff)
> > > In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> > > >
> > > > # l /mnt/d1
> > > > total 16
> > >
Rogier Wolff wrote:
>
> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > By author:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rogier Wolff)
> > In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> > >
> > > # l /mnt/d1
> > > total 16
> > > drwxr-xr-x 512 root root16384 Mar 24 17:26 dcim/
> > > -r-xr-xr-x 1
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> By author:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rogier Wolff)
> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> >
> > # l /mnt/d1
> > total 16
> > drwxr-xr-x 512 root root16384 Mar 24 17:26 dcim/
> > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root root0 May 23 2000
Michael Rothwell wrote:
>
> From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > "dcim" probably stands for "digital camera images". At least Canon
> > digital cameras always put their data in a directory named dcim.
>
> Makes sense. FAT's root directory is limited in the number of entries it can
> c
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "dcim" probably stands for "digital camera images". At least Canon
> digital cameras always put their data in a directory named dcim.
Makes sense. FAT's root directory is limited in the number of entries it can
contain, to something like 32. Cameras c
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rogier Wolff)
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> # l /mnt/d1
> total 16
> drwxr-xr-x 512 root root16384 Mar 24 17:26 dcim/
> -r-xr-xr-x 1 root root0 May 23 2000 memstick.ind*
> #
>
> Where the *(
> 001b0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 80 02
> 001c0 08 00 01 07 d0 dd 27 00 00 00 d9 ee 01 00 00 00
P]'...Yn
> 001f0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 55 aa
..U*
> 04e00 e9 00 00 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 00 02 20 01 00 i..
18 matches
Mail list logo