Re: Linux 4.4.256

2021-02-08 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 09:14:53AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 09:22:44AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > [ ... ] > > > There are lots (35) of "KERNEL_VERSION(4, 5, 0)" in chromeos-4.4. > > > That should not matter with the clamped LINUX_VERSION_CODE, but > > > I'd pref

Re: Linux 4.4.256

2021-02-08 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 09:22:44AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: [ ... ] > > There are lots (35) of "KERNEL_VERSION(4, 5, 0)" in chromeos-4.4. > > That should not matter with the clamped LINUX_VERSION_CODE, but > > I'd prefer to clamp KERNEL_VERSION as well just to be sure. On > > top of that, s

Re: Linux 4.4.256

2021-02-08 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 09:38:05AM +, David Laight wrote: > From: David Laight > > Sent: 08 February 2021 09:10 > > > > From: Willy Tarreau > > > Sent: 06 February 2021 13:23 > > > > > > On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 02:11:13PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > > Something like this looks more robus

RE: Linux 4.4.256

2021-02-08 Thread David Laight
From: David Laight > Sent: 08 February 2021 09:10 > > From: Willy Tarreau > > Sent: 06 February 2021 13:23 > > > > On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 02:11:13PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > Something like this looks more robust to me, it will use SUBLEVEL for > > > values 0 to 255 and 255 for any larger

RE: Linux 4.4.256

2021-02-08 Thread David Laight
From: Willy Tarreau > Sent: 06 February 2021 13:23 > > On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 02:11:13PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > Something like this looks more robust to me, it will use SUBLEVEL for > > values 0 to 255 and 255 for any larger value: > > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile > index 7d86ad6ad3

Re: Linux 4.4.256

2021-02-07 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 10:49:26AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 07:13:39PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 08:59:42AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > On 2/6/21 5:22 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > > On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 02:11:13PM +0100, Wil

Re: Linux 4.4.256

2021-02-06 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 07:13:39PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 08:59:42AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On 2/6/21 5:22 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 02:11:13PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > >> Something like this looks more robust to me, i

Re: Linux 4.4.256

2021-02-06 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 08:59:42AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 2/6/21 5:22 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 02:11:13PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > >> Something like this looks more robust to me, it will use SUBLEVEL for > >> values 0 to 255 and 255 for any larger value: >

Re: Linux 4.4.256

2021-02-06 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 2/6/21 5:22 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 02:11:13PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: >> Something like this looks more robust to me, it will use SUBLEVEL for >> values 0 to 255 and 255 for any larger value: >> >> -expr $(VERSION) \* 65536 + 0$(PATCHLEVEL) \* 256 + 0$(SUBLEVE

Re: Linux 4.4.256

2021-02-06 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 02:19:57PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 02:11:13PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 02:00:27PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > I think Sasha's patch here: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210205174702.1904681-1-s

Re: Linux 4.4.256

2021-02-06 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 02:11:13PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Something like this looks more robust to me, it will use SUBLEVEL for > values 0 to 255 and 255 for any larger value: > > - expr $(VERSION) \* 65536 + 0$(PATCHLEVEL) \* 256 + 0$(SUBLEVEL)); \ > + expr $(VERSION) \* 65536 + 0$

Re: Linux 4.4.256

2021-02-06 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 02:11:13PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 02:00:27PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > I think Sasha's patch here: > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210205174702.1904681-1-sas...@kernel.org > > is looking like the solution. > > It might cause tro

Re: Linux 4.4.256

2021-02-06 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 02:00:27PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > I think Sasha's patch here: > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210205174702.1904681-1-sas...@kernel.org > is looking like the solution. It might cause trouble to those forcing SUBLEVEL to a given version such as .0 to avoid exp

Re: Linux 4.4.256

2021-02-06 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 12:56:58PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 03:26:36PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > I'm announcing the release of the 4.4.256 kernel. > > > > This, and the 4.9.256 release are a little bit "different" than normal. > > > > This contains only 1 p

Re: Linux 4.4.256

2021-02-05 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index b18b61e540e9..0057587d2cbe 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ VERSION = 4 PATCHLEVEL = 4 -SUBLEVEL = 255 +SUBLEVEL = 256 EXTRAVERSION = NAME = Blurry Fish Butt

Re: Linux 4.4.256

2021-02-05 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 03:26:36PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > I'm announcing the release of the 4.4.256 kernel. > > This, and the 4.9.256 release are a little bit "different" than normal. > > This contains only 1 patch, just the version bump from .255 to .256 which ends > up causing the u