RE: tulip (was RE: Kernel 2.4.3 fails to compile)

2001-04-09 Thread Manuel A. McLure
Jeff Garzik said: [snip conversation about NETDEV WATCHDOG errors on ADMTek Comet tulip clone card] > > Ok, this should be fixed in the latest patches sent to Alan and Linus. Testing with 2.4.3-ac3 and so far, so good. Thanks! -- Manuel A. McLure - Unify Corp. Technical Support <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: tulip (was RE: Kernel 2.4.3 fails to compile)

2001-04-05 Thread Jeff Garzik
"Manuel A. McLure" wrote: > > Jeff Garzik wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Manuel A. McLure wrote: > > > It looks like the tulip driver isn't as up-to-date as the one from > > > 2.4.2-ac20 - when is 2.4.3-ac1 due? :-) I got NETDEV > > WATCHDOG errors shortly > > > after rebooting with 2.4.3, altho

Re: Kernel 2.4.3 fails to compile

2001-04-02 Thread Alan Cox
> > buz.c: In function `v4l_fbuffer_alloc': > > buz.c:188: `KMALLOC_MAXSIZE' undeclared (first use in this function) > > buz.c:188: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > > buz.c:188: for each function it appears in.) > > Easy solution -- just delete the entire test > > if (si

RE: tulip (was RE: Kernel 2.4.3 fails to compile)

2001-03-30 Thread Manuel A. McLure
Jeff Garzik wrote: > On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Manuel A. McLure wrote: > > It looks like the tulip driver isn't as up-to-date as the one from > > 2.4.2-ac20 - when is 2.4.3-ac1 due? :-) I got NETDEV > WATCHDOG errors shortly > > after rebooting with 2.4.3, although these were of the > "slow/packet lo

tulip (was RE: Kernel 2.4.3 fails to compile)

2001-03-30 Thread Jeff Garzik
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Manuel A. McLure wrote: > It looks like the tulip driver isn't as up-to-date as the one from > 2.4.2-ac20 - when is 2.4.3-ac1 due? :-) I got NETDEV WATCHDOG errors shortly > after rebooting with 2.4.3, although these were of the "slow/packet lossy" > type I got with 2.4.2-ac20

RE: Kernel 2.4.3 fails to compile

2001-03-30 Thread Manuel A. McLure
Jeff Garzik wrote: > On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Manuel A. McLure wrote: > > > Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Manuel A. McLure wrote: > > > > > > > ... > > > > gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall > > > -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 > > > > -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing

RE: Kernel 2.4.3 fails to compile

2001-03-30 Thread Jeff Garzik
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Manuel A. McLure wrote: > Jeff Garzik wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Manuel A. McLure wrote: > > > > > ... > > > gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall > > -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 > > > -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe > > -mpreferred-stack-bound

RE: Kernel 2.4.3 fails to compile

2001-03-30 Thread Manuel A. McLure
Jeff Garzik wrote: > On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Manuel A. McLure wrote: > > > ... > > gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall > -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 > > -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe > -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 > > -march=athlon -DMODULE -DMODVERSIONS -include > > /us

Re: Kernel 2.4.3 fails to compile

2001-03-30 Thread Jeff Garzik
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Manuel A. McLure wrote: > ... > gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 > -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 > -march=athlon -DMODULE -DMODVERSIONS -include > /usr/src/linux/include/linux/modversions