DEAR FRIEND,
How are you doing?
Hope your business will be getting better and better day by day.
We sent an email to you in the past days, Did you receive it.??
We are Urgently in need of your products, So please confirm to us if
you /your company can make provision of the exact products as
On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 08:13 -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 13:57 +0200, Mathieu Fluhr wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 06:06 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> > > The SCSI midlayer makes a lot of "if scsi version <= 2" choices. In the
> > > case of ATAPI, we do not want to f
On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 13:57 +0200, Mathieu Fluhr wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 06:06 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> > The SCSI midlayer makes a lot of "if scsi version <= 2" choices. In the
> > case of ATAPI, we do not want to force ATAPI down the path of ancient
> > SCSI devices, as this disab
On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 06:06 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> The SCSI midlayer makes a lot of "if scsi version <= 2" choices. In the
> case of ATAPI, we do not want to force ATAPI down the path of ancient
> SCSI devices, as this disables some MMC features that modern ATAPI
> devices support.
If I
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 21:31 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Robert Hancock wrote:
> > This doesn't seem a very reliable way to identify an IDE device, as all
> > that 0 means is that the device does not claim conformance to any
> > standard. I would think it would be legitimate for an IDE device to put
Mathieu Fluhr wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 21:31 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Robert Hancock wrote:
This doesn't seem a very reliable way to identify an IDE device, as all
that 0 means is that the device does not claim conformance to any
standard. I would think it would be legitimate for an IDE de
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 21:31 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Robert Hancock wrote:
> > This doesn't seem a very reliable way to identify an IDE device, as all
> > that 0 means is that the device does not claim conformance to any
> > standard. I would think it would be legitimate for an IDE device to put
Robert Hancock wrote:
This doesn't seem a very reliable way to identify an IDE device, as all
that 0 means is that the device does not claim conformance to any
standard. I would think it would be legitimate for an IDE device to put
a value like 5 in there as well, if it complies with SPC-4..
Vi
(cc-ing linux-ide)
Mathieu Fluhr wrote:
Hello all,
First of all, let me introduce myself a little bit. I am the responsable
for the development of the Nero Linux burning application. So I have
access to all the source code of the application.
Now let's go with the story: It seems that there
9 matches
Mail list logo
