On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, John William wrote:
> If shared, edge triggered interrupts are ok then I will talk to the driver
> maintainers about the problem. If this isn't ok, then maybe the sanity check
> in pci-irq.c would be to force level triggering only on shared PCI
> interrupts?
DEFINITELY
> maintainers about the problem. If this isn't ok, then maybe the sanity check
> in pci-irq.c would be to force level triggering only on shared PCI
> interrupts?
This seems a sensible path to take for such machines
> I'm going down this path because I can't see a good way to check for the
> p
>From: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > So PCI interrupts must always be level triggered? If so, then the kernel
> > should never program the IO APIC to use an edge triggered interrupt on a
>PCI
> > device. If that's true, then why not force the interrupt type to level
> > triggered for all PCI
> So PCI interrupts must always be level triggered? If so, then the kernel
> should never program the IO APIC to use an edge triggered interrupt on a PCI
> device. If that's true, then why not force the interrupt type to level
> triggered for all PCI devices (to work around a potentially broken
>From: "Dunlap, Randy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: John William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > If PCI interrupts are shared, force them to be level
> > triggered? Can shared
> > PCI interrupts be edge triggered? If not, then wouldn't this
> > be the correct
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: John William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> I'm having a problem with kernel 2.4.2-SMP on my HP Vectra XU
> 5/90. This is an old dual-pentium (Neptune chipset) machine.
>
...
>
> OR
>
> If PCI interrupts are shared, force them to be level
> triggered? Ca
6 matches
Mail list logo
