Hi,
On 5/09/2005 4:32 a.m., James Bottomley wrote:
On Sun, 2005-09-04 at 01:24 +1200, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
I am seeing it fill up my messages log as it is logging 1 or so messages each
minute. I've emailed the SCSI maintainer James Bottomley twice about it but
had no response either time.
On Sun, 2005-09-04 at 01:24 +1200, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
> I am seeing it fill up my messages log as it is logging 1 or so messages each
> minute. I've emailed the SCSI maintainer James Bottomley twice about it but
> had no response either time.
OK, can you try this ... it should confirm the t
Brown, Len wrote:
Please then try the latest ACPI patch here:
>
http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/lenb/acpi/patches
/release/2.6.13/acpi-20050902-2.6.13.diff.gz
> It should apply to vanilla 2.6.13 with a reject in ia64/Kconfig
> that you can ignore.
>
> If this works, then we
On Sat, 2005-09-03 at 23:51 +1000, Peter Williams wrote:
> > Are you seeing this "Device not ready" message appear over and over, or
> > just the once?
>
> Just the once.
OK, I finally have a theory about this. It's the everything goes via
bios code. Previously there were several levels at wh
>As for the inability to log in, this bug may be relevant,
>given I also had
>that problem:
>
>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166422
>
>There are fixes in the pipeline for util-linux audit
>interaction in Fedora as
>well. I know because I reported those too ;)
>
>> afte
>> > Please then try the latest ACPI patch here:
>> >
>http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/lenb/acpi/patches
>/release/2.6.13/acpi-20050902-2.6.13.diff.gz
>> > It should apply to vanilla 2.6.13 with a reject in ia64/Kconfig
>> > that you can ignore.
>> >
>> > If this works, then we
Reuben Farrelly wrote:
Hi Peter,
On 3/09/2005 4:59 a.m., Peter Williams wrote:
Brown, Len wrote:
[ 279.662960] [] wait_for_completion+0xa4/0x110
possibly a missing interrupt?
CONFIG_ACPI=y
any difference if booted with "acpi=off" or "acpi=noirq"?
Yes. In both cases, the syst
Hi Peter,
On 3/09/2005 4:59 a.m., Peter Williams wrote:
Brown, Len wrote:
[ 279.662960] [] wait_for_completion+0xa4/0x110
possibly a missing interrupt?
CONFIG_ACPI=y
any difference if booted with "acpi=off" or "acpi=noirq"?
Yes. In both cases, the system appears to boot normally b
Peter Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Please then try the latest ACPI patch here:
> >
> http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/lenb/acpi/patches/release/2.6.13/acpi-20050902-2.6.13.diff.gz
> > It should apply to vanilla 2.6.13 with a reject in ia64/Kconfig
> > that you can igno
Len Brown wrote:
On Sat, 2005-09-03 at 03:18 -0400, Peter Williams wrote:
http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.13/2.6.13-mm1/broken-out/git-acpi.patch
I am able to confirm that the problem occurs with vanilla 2.5.13 after
I apply the above patch.
Thanks.
Pl
On Sat, 2005-09-03 at 03:18 -0400, Peter Williams wrote:
>
> http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.13/2.6.13-mm1/broken-out/git-acpi.patch
> >>
> I am able to confirm that the problem occurs with vanilla 2.5.13 after
> I apply the above patch.
Thanks.
Please then tr
Peter Williams wrote:
Brown, Len wrote:
Brown, Len wrote:
[ 279.662960] [] wait_for_completion+0xa4/0x110
possibly a missing interrupt?
CONFIG_ACPI=y
any difference if booted with "acpi=off" or "acpi=noirq"?
Yes. In both cases, the system appears to boot normally but I'm
Brown, Len wrote:
Brown, Len wrote:
[ 279.662960] [] wait_for_completion+0xa4/0x110
possibly a missing interrupt?
CONFIG_ACPI=y
any difference if booted with "acpi=off" or "acpi=noirq"?
Yes. In both cases, the system appears to boot normally but
I'm unable
to login or connec
>Brown, Len wrote:
[ 279.662960] [] wait_for_completion+0xa4/0x110
>>
>>
>> possibly a missing interrupt?
>>
>>
>>>CONFIG_ACPI=y
>>
>>
>> any difference if booted with "acpi=off" or "acpi=noirq"?
>
>Yes. In both cases, the system appears to boot normally but
>I'm unable
>to login o
Peter Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Brown, Len wrote:
> >>>[ 279.662960] [] wait_for_completion+0xa4/0x110
> >
> >
> > possibly a missing interrupt?
> >
> >
> >>CONFIG_ACPI=y
> >
> >
> > any difference if booted with "acpi=off" or "acpi=noirq"?
>
> Yes. In both cases, the system
Brown, Len wrote:
[ 279.662960] [] wait_for_completion+0xa4/0x110
possibly a missing interrupt?
CONFIG_ACPI=y
any difference if booted with "acpi=off" or "acpi=noirq"?
Yes. In both cases, the system appears to boot normally but I'm unable
to login or connect via ssh. Also there's
> > [ 279.662960] [] wait_for_completion+0xa4/0x110
possibly a missing interrupt?
> CONFIG_ACPI=y
any difference if booted with "acpi=off" or "acpi=noirq"?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo inf
Peter Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Peter Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>... at the the point indicated by the following output:
> >>
> >>[8.197224] Freeing unused kernel memory: 288k freed
> >>[8.428217] SCSI subsystem initialized
> >>[8
Andrew Morton wrote:
Peter Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... at the the point indicated by the following output:
[8.197224] Freeing unused kernel memory: 288k freed
[8.428217] SCSI subsystem initialized
[8.510376] sym0: <810a> rev 0x23 at pci :00:08.0 irq 11
[8.587731
Peter Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ... at the the point indicated by the following output:
>
> [8.197224] Freeing unused kernel memory: 288k freed
> [8.428217] SCSI subsystem initialized
> [8.510376] sym0: <810a> rev 0x23 at pci :00:08.0 irq 11
> [8.587731] sym0: No
20 matches
Mail list logo
