..@vger.kernel.org; Linuxarm; xuwei (O); linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org; Wangzhou (B);
> liudongdong (C); Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo); bhelg...@google.com;
> zhangjukuo; Liguozhu (Kenneth); qiujiang
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Add ACPI support for HiSilicon PCI
On 2/8/2016 8:55 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> I haven't really followed what is going on with ACPI. Do you expect
> to see future machines come out that are not just implementing SBSA
> but that still need to run ACPI? I thought this was just a hack
> for some early machines that only run with ACPI b
On Monday 08 February 2016 13:17:58 Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
>
> Now I have removed the dependency from designware but I still think
> the best location for the code is in "drivers/pci/host/":
> the ACPI quirks share the config read/write functions with the DT
> driver, moreover for other hosts in
om; zhangjukuo; xuwei (O); Liguozhu (Kenneth); linux-
> p...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-
> a...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; j...@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Add ACPI support for HiSilicon PCIe Host
> Controllers
>
>
om; zhangjukuo; xuwei (O); Liguozhu (Kenneth); linux-
> p...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-
> a...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; j...@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Add ACPI support for HiSilicon PCIe Host
> Controllers
>
>
On Thursday 04 February 2016 16:44:12 Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> Effectively the ACPI version of the HiSilicon driver does not rely on
> Designware as much as the DT version (that calls dw_pcie_host_init());
> however in order to do what you suggest I'd need to copy and paste and
> modify dw_pcie_rd
om; zhangjukuo; xuwei (O); Liguozhu (Kenneth); linux-
> p...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-
> a...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; j...@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Add ACPI support for HiSilicon PCIe Host
> Controllers
>
>
On Thursday 04 February 2016 15:11:18 Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> >
> > ACPI has its own PCI support, and should not need drivers for host
> > bridges. I don't think we can really mix the two things, as ACPI
> > needs to have access to things like PCI config space way before
> > we are probing norma
.pieral...@arm.com;
> t...@semihalf.com; zhangjukuo; xuwei (O); Liguozhu (Kenneth); linux-
> p...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-
> a...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; j...@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Add ACPI support for HiS
On Thursday 04 February 2016 19:37:36 Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> From: gabriele paoloni
>
> This patchset adds ACPI support for the HiSilicon Hip05/Hip06 SoC PCIe
> controllers
> The four patches respectively:
> - rework PCie Designware to be used for ACPI PCI Host controllers
> -
10 matches
Mail list logo
