On 2/15/21 6:31 PM, viswa...@microchip.com wrote:
Hi John,
We could test this patch and it works fine. Regarding the usage of
request->tag, We have some challenges there.
Pm80xx driver need tag for internal command as well. Tag is controller wide and
we need to assign unique tag
for internal c
2327 ; ra...@google.com;
bjashn...@google.com; vishakh...@google.com;
jinpu.w...@cloud.ionos.com; Ashokkumar N - X53535
Cc: linux-s...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; h...@suse.de;
kashyap.de...@broadcom.com; ming@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH] scsi: pm8001: Expose HW queues f
.de;
> kashyap.de...@broadcom.com; ming....@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH] scsi: pm8001: Expose HW queues for pm80xx
> hw
>
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> content is safe
>
> On 01/02/2021 17:08, viswa...@microchip.com w
e.com;
> >> jinpu.w...@cloud.ionos.com; Ashokkumar N - X53535
> >>
> >> Cc: linux-s...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> >> h...@suse.de; kashyap.de...@broadcom.com; ming@redhat.com
> >> Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH] scsi: pm8001: Expose HW
.de...@broadcom.com; ming@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH] scsi: pm8001: Expose HW queues for pm80xx
hw
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
content is safe
On 31/01/2021 07:19, viswa...@microchip.com wrote:
Thanks Johns.
We could see a kernel crash wh
om; ming....@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH] scsi: pm8001: Expose HW queues for pm80xx
> hw
>
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> content is safe
>
> On 31/01/2021 07:19, viswa...@microchip.com wrote:
> > Thanks Johns.
On 31/01/2021 07:19, viswa...@microchip.com wrote:
Thanks Johns.
We could see a kernel crash while testing this patch.
Thanks for testing.
[ 246.724632] scsi host10: pm80xx
[ 248.005258] sas: Enter sas_scsi_recover_host busy: 0 failed: 0
[ 248.168973] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference
Thanks Johns.
We could see a kernel crash while testing this patch.
[ 246.724632] scsi host10: pm80xx
[ 248.005258] sas: Enter sas_scsi_recover_host busy: 0 failed: 0
[ 248.168973] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0110
[ 248.175926] #PF: supervisor read access in ke
On 11/01/2021 11:57, Jinpu Wang wrote:
Hi John,
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 12:21 PM John Garry wrote:
In commit 05c6c029a44d ("scsi: pm80xx: Increase number of supported
queues"), support for 80xx chip was improved by enabling multiple HW
queues.
In this, like other SCSI MQ HBA drivers, the HW
Hi John,
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 12:21 PM John Garry wrote:
>
> In commit 05c6c029a44d ("scsi: pm80xx: Increase number of supported
> queues"), support for 80xx chip was improved by enabling multiple HW
> queues.
>
> In this, like other SCSI MQ HBA drivers, the HW queues were not exposed
> to upp
10 matches
Mail list logo
