On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 14:03 -0800, Rajesh Shah wrote:
> Does this patch help?
YES! I can now power down the slot, see it gone from pci list, reenable
it, etc. Awesome. Thank you.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# lspci -s 08:00
08:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 105f (rev 03)
08:00.1
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 03:03:16PM -0800, Tom Duffy wrote:
>
> I have updated to Wilcox's rewrite, Rajesh's stuff, and Dely's latest
> patch. Still seeing these:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# modprobe acpiphp
> acpiphp: ACPI Hot Plug PCI Controller Driver version: 0.5
> acpiphp: Slot [4] registered
On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 13:27, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 10:04:57AM -0800, Rajesh Shah wrote:
> > > - Are you wanting the acpi specific patches to go into the
> tree
> > > through the acpi developers? How about the ia64 specific
> > > patches?
> >
> > I honestly don't
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 19:13 -0800, Dely Sy wrote:
> I just did a test of Rajesh's latest patch on 2.6.11.5 with
> Wilcox's acpiphp rewrite and the following patch. Hot-plug of
> PCI Express card worked fine on my i386 system
I have updated to Wilcox's rewrite, Rajesh's stuff, and Dely's latest
p
On Monday, March 21, 2005 5:07 PM, Dely Sy wrote:
> On Monday, March 21, 2005 10:05 AM, Rajesh Shah wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 09:13:32PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > - Does this break the i386 acpiphp functionality?
> > Dely Sy had tested hotplug with an earlier version of my patches
> >
On Monday, March 21, 2005 10:05 AM, Rajesh Shah wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 09:13:32PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > - Does this break the i386 acpiphp functionality?
> Dely Sy had tested hotplug with an earlier version of my patches
> (with minor differences from the current series) on i386
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 12:34:07PM -0800, Paul Ionescu wrote:
>
> --- Rajesh Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > No. The current patches only trigger when a _root_ bridge is
> > hot-added, not a PCI to PCI bridge (which is what the docking
> > station is). The code to support p2p bridge hotp
Hi Rajesh,
--- Rajesh Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 03:50:16PM +0200, Paul Ionescu wrote:
> >
> > Does this mean that when it will be ported for i386, I will be able to
> > really use my Docking Station ?
>
> No. The current patches only trigger when a _root_ bridge i
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 03:50:16PM +0200, Paul Ionescu wrote:
>
> Does this mean that when it will be ported for i386, I will be able to
> really use my Docking Station ?
No. The current patches only trigger when a _root_ bridge is
hot-added, not a PCI to PCI bridge (which is what the docking
st
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 10:04:57AM -0800, Rajesh Shah wrote:
> > - Are you wanting the acpi specific patches to go into the tree
> > through the acpi developers? How about the ia64 specific
> > patches?
>
> I honestly don't know what the best approach is here - what do you
> recom
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 09:13:32PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
>
> This all looks very good, nice job. I only had one minor comment on the
> patches, which I'll reply to directly.
>
> But I did have a few questions:
> - This series relys on Mathew's rewrite of the acpiphp driver.
> Is th
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:38:57 -0800, Rajesh Shah wrote:
> Here is a series of patches to support ACPI hot-add of a root bridge
> hierarchy. The added hierarchy may contain other p2p bridges and end/leaf
> I/O devices too. The root bridge itself is assumed to have been assigned
> resource ranges, bu
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 01:38:57PM -0800, Rajesh Shah wrote:
> Here is a series of patches to support ACPI hot-add of a root
> bridge hierarchy. The added hierarchy may contain other p2p
> bridges and end/leaf I/O devices too. The root bridge itself is
> assumed to have been assigned resource rang
13 matches
Mail list logo
