>
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 06:31:23PM +, Liang, Kan wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
> > > could not reproduce this one.. any chance you could compile with
> > > DEBUG=1 and re-run in gdb for more details? like which of the frees
> > > got crazy.. ?
> > >
> > The crash is not caused by this patch set. I
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 06:31:23PM +, Liang, Kan wrote:
SNIP
> > could not reproduce this one.. any chance you could compile with
> > DEBUG=1 and re-run in gdb for more details? like which of the frees got
> > crazy.. ?
> >
> The crash is not caused by this patch set. It's also a bug in curre
>
> >
> >
> > 3. I think you have already handled new record type for perf stat record.
> > But the "unhandled!" message still show in the perf report -D.
> >
> > 0x598 [0x30]: PERF_RECORD_STAT
> > ... id 22385, cpu 0, thread 0
> > ... value 1752, enabled 501473097, running 501473097
> > : unhan
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 06:37:43PM +, Liang, Kan wrote:
>
> Hi Jirka
>
> I'm doing some test with the perf/stat_script tree.
> Here are the issues I found so far.
hi,
thanks a lot for testing!
>
> 1 test case failed to build:
>
> CC tests/stat.o
> tests/stat.c: In function âtest__
Hi Jirka
I'm doing some test with the perf/stat_script tree.
Here are the issues I found so far.
1 test case failed to build:
CC tests/stat.o
tests/stat.c: In function âtest__synthesize_statâ:
tests/stat.c:82:3: error: missing initializer for field âenaâ of
âstruct â [-Werror=missing-fi
5 matches
Mail list logo
