Hi Arnd!
On Wed Dec 20 14:14:07 2017 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > If it will be still possible to build the binary kernel of the same
> > size after the conversion, I'm in for testing, otherwise it will not
> > fit into Flash any more...
>
> I think there is an increase in code size that comes mainl
Hi Linus,
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Lukasz Majewski
> wrote:
> >> On Wed Dec 13 08:34:22 2017 Linus Walleij
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Lukasz Majewski
> >> > wrote: Out of curiosity: Liebherr is obviously doing heavy-duty
> >> > industrial control systems. L
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Alexander Sverdlin
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed Dec 20 13:50:28 2017 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> I'm generally more interested in the multiplatform conversion than
>> the DT conversion, and I think converting this one to multiplatform
>> isn't actually that hard, and doesn
Hi Arnd,
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Linus Walleij
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Lukasz Majewski
> > wrote:
>
> >
> > There is a point where supporting old board files will stand in
> > the way and cost a lot in maintenance (like moving drivers our
> > of arch/arm, or m
Hi!
On Wed Dec 20 13:50:28 2017 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> I'm generally more interested in the multiplatform conversion than
> the DT conversion, and I think converting this one to multiplatform
> isn't actually that hard, and doesn't have a significant risk for
> regressions, the main work is to co
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
It would also be helpful
to test whether the -march=armv4t/--fix-v4bx workaround produces
working binaries for
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
>
> There is a point where supporting old board files will stand in
> the way and cost a lot in maintenance (like moving drivers our
> of arch/arm, or modernizing misc subsystems). The
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
>>> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 8:41 PM, Lukasz Majewski
>>> wrote:
>>> >> >> We also need to think about upholding support in GCC for
>>> >> >> ARMv4(t) for the foreseeable future if th
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
>> On Wed Dec 13 08:34:22 2017 Linus Walleij
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Lukasz Majewski
>> > wrote: Out of curiosity: Liebherr is obviously doing heavy-duty
>> > industrial control systems. Likewise Hartley is doing si
Hi Arnd,
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 10:36 PM, Lukasz Majewski
> wrote:
> > Hi Arnd,
> >
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> On Mon Dec 18 12:55:40 2017 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> > > GCC 7.2 is working
> >> >
> >> > Ah wait, this is still for ep93xx, which is always at least
> >> > armv4t, right? So it won't
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 10:36 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> On Mon Dec 18 12:55:40 2017 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> > > GCC 7.2 is working
>> >
>> > Ah wait, this is still for ep93xx, which is always at least armv4t,
>> > right? So it won't have a problem with the armv4 depreca
Hi Arnd,
> Hi!
>
> On Mon Dec 18 12:55:40 2017 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > GCC 7.2 is working
> >
> > Ah wait, this is still for ep93xx, which is always at least armv4t,
> > right? So it won't have a problem with the armv4 deprecation
> > anyway, even
>
> Correct.
Maybe a bit off topic :-)
Hi!
On Mon Dec 18 12:55:40 2017 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > GCC 7.2 is working
>
> Ah wait, this is still for ep93xx, which is always at least armv4t,
> right? So it won't have a problem with the armv4 deprecation anyway, even
Correct.
--
Alex.
On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
>> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 8:41 PM, Lukasz Majewski
>> wrote:
>> >> >> We also need to think about upholding support in GCC for
>> >> >> ARMv4(t) for the foreseeable future if there is a big web of
>> >> >> random deeply embedd
Hi Arnd,
> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 8:41 PM, Lukasz Majewski
> wrote:
> >> >> We also need to think about upholding support in GCC for
> >> >> ARMv4(t) for the foreseeable future if there is a big web of
> >> >> random deeply embedded systems out there that will need
> >> >> updates.
> >> >
> >>
On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 8:41 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
>> >> We also need to think about upholding support in GCC for
>> >> ARMv4(t) for the foreseeable future if there is a big web of
>> >> random deeply embedded systems out there that will need
>> >> updates.
>> >
>> > But we should definitely
Hi Arnd,
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Alexander Sverdlin
> wrote:
> > On Wed Dec 13 08:34:22 2017 Linus Walleij
> > wrote:
> >> Arnd has been nudging me to do DT conversion for EP93xx
> >> so if there are many active industrial users of these
> >> I should prioritize it, because these th
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Alexander Sverdlin
wrote:
> On Wed Dec 13 08:34:22 2017 Linus Walleij wrote:
>> Arnd has been nudging me to do DT conversion for EP93xx
>> so if there are many active industrial users of these
>> I should prioritize it, because these things have 20+ years
>> suppo
Hi Alexander, Linus
> Hello Linus!
>
> On Wed Dec 13 08:34:22 2017 Linus Walleij
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Lukasz Majewski
> > wrote: Out of curiosity: Liebherr is obviously doing heavy-duty
> > industrial control systems. Likewise Hartley is doing similar
> > business over
Hello Linus!
On Wed Dec 13 08:34:22 2017 Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> Out of curiosity: Liebherr is obviously doing heavy-duty industrial
> control systems. Likewise Hartley is doing similar business over
> at Vision Engravings.
>
> Is the si
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> This patch series adds support for Liebherr's BK3 board, being
> a derivative of TS72XX design.
All looks good.
Acked-by: Linus Walleij
Out of curiosity: Liebherr is obviously doing heavy-duty industrial
control systems. Likewise Hartl
On Monday, December 11, 2017 4:36 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> This patch series adds support for Liebherr's BK3 board, being a derivative
> of TS72XX design.
>
> This patchset consists of following patches:
>
> - ts72xx.[c|h] cosmetic cleanup/improvement
> - Rewrite ts72xx.c to be reusable by bk3
22 matches
Mail list logo
