Hi Mike,
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 04:14:53, Mike Turquette wrote:
> I think Paul W. or someone on the TI side should weigh in on your clkdev
> entries. My main point is that the actual tree should be modeled and
> clocks shouldn't be globbed together unnecessarily. As mentioned in the
> other ma
Quoting Mohammed, Afzal (2013-01-25 04:05:44)
> Hi Mike,
>
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 22:30:44, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > Quoting Mohammed, Afzal (2013-01-24 03:36:02)
>
> > > So there are 3 - LIDD is actually not for present use case, CORE could
> > > be clubbed with the divider to have a composi
Hi Mike,
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 22:30:44, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Mohammed, Afzal (2013-01-24 03:36:02)
> > So there are 3 - LIDD is actually not for present use case, CORE could
> > be clubbed with the divider to have a composite clock. And CORE is
> > in functional clock path and logic
Quoting Mohammed, Afzal (2013-01-24 03:36:02)
> Hi Mike,
>
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 01:52:04, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > Quoting Afzal Mohammed (2013-01-23 03:48:56)
>
> > > +static inline void da8xx_fb_clkc_enable(void)
> > > +{
> > > if (lcd_revision == LCD_VERSION_2)
> > >
Hi Mike,
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 01:52:04, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Afzal Mohammed (2013-01-23 03:48:56)
> > +static inline void da8xx_fb_clkc_enable(void)
> > +{
> > if (lcd_revision == LCD_VERSION_2)
> > lcdc_write(LCD_V2_DMA_CLK_EN | LCD_V2_LIDD_CLK_EN |
> >
Quoting Afzal Mohammed (2013-01-23 03:48:56)
> +static inline void da8xx_fb_clkc_enable(void)
> +{
> if (lcd_revision == LCD_VERSION_2)
> lcdc_write(LCD_V2_DMA_CLK_EN | LCD_V2_LIDD_CLK_EN |
> LCD_V2_CORE_CLK_EN, LCD_CLK_ENABLE_REG);
> }
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
