Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] KVM: x86: track guest page access

2016-02-23 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 23/02/2016 06:44, Tian, Kevin wrote: >> From: Song, Jike >> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 11:02 AM >> >> +Kevin >> >> On 02/22/2016 06:05 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote: >>> >>> On 02/19/2016 08:00 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: I still have a doubt: how are you going to handle invalidation o

Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] KVM: x86: track guest page access

2016-02-23 Thread Jike Song
rnel.org, "kai huang" , >> "Andrea Arcangeli" , >> "Kevin Tian" >> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 4:02:25 AM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] KVM: x86: track guest page access >> >> +Kevin >> >> On 02/22/2016 06:

Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] KVM: x86: track guest page access

2016-02-23 Thread Paolo Bonzini
uot; , > "Kevin Tian" > Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 4:02:25 AM > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] KVM: x86: track guest page access > > +Kevin > > On 02/22/2016 06:05 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote: > > > > On 02/19/2016 08:00 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >

RE: [PATCH v3 00/11] KVM: x86: track guest page access

2016-02-22 Thread Tian, Kevin
> From: Song, Jike > Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 11:02 AM > > +Kevin > > On 02/22/2016 06:05 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote: > > > > On 02/19/2016 08:00 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >> > >> I still have a doubt: how are you going to handle invalidation of GPU > >> shadow page tables if a device (emu

Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] KVM: x86: track guest page access

2016-02-22 Thread Jike Song
+Kevin On 02/22/2016 06:05 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote: > > On 02/19/2016 08:00 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> >> I still have a doubt: how are you going to handle invalidation of GPU >> shadow page tables if a device (emulated in QEMU or even vhost) does DMA >> to the PPGTT? > > I think Jike is the b

Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] KVM: x86: track guest page access

2016-02-22 Thread Xiao Guangrong
On 02/19/2016 08:00 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: On 14/02/2016 12:31, Xiao Guangrong wrote: Changelong in v3: - refine the code of mmu_need_write_protect() based on Huang Kai's suggestion - rebase the patchset against current code Changelog in v2: - fix a issue that the track memory of memslot

Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] KVM: x86: track guest page access

2016-02-19 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 14/02/2016 12:31, Xiao Guangrong wrote: > Changelong in v3: > - refine the code of mmu_need_write_protect() based on Huang Kai's suggestion > - rebase the patchset against current code > > Changelog in v2: > - fix a issue that the track memory of memslot is freed if we only move > the memsl