RE: [PATCH v29 0/6] JTAG driver introduction

2021-04-06 Thread Corona, Ernesto
x-asp...@lists.ozlabs.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v29 0/6] JTAG driver introduction Hi Andy, On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 04:22:04PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 01:46:35PM +0300, Paul Ferts

Re: [PATCH v29 0/6] JTAG driver introduction

2021-04-06 Thread Paul Fertser
Hi Andy, On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 04:22:04PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 01:46:35PM +0300, Paul Fertser wrote: > > I have to note that the current v29 version of the series is broken in > > several aspects: > > Is it correct that this series is actually abandoned so fa

Re: [PATCH v29 0/6] JTAG driver introduction

2021-04-06 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 01:46:35PM +0300, Paul Fertser wrote: > Hello, > > This is a multi-part review of the series, with general notes inline > in this message, and specific points raised as replies to the > individual patches. > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 03:29:14PM -0700, Ernesto Corona wrote:

Re: [PATCH v29 0/6] JTAG driver introduction

2021-01-15 Thread Paul Fertser
Hello, This is a multi-part review of the series, with general notes inline in this message, and specific points raised as replies to the individual patches. On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 03:29:14PM -0700, Ernesto Corona wrote: > We propose to implement general JTAG interface and infrastructure > to co