On 12/16/2013 05:14 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 05:18:26PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Rajat Jain wrote:
Once again: the way I interpret this is: * Always enable Link events.
* Disa
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 05:18:26PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Rajat Jain wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > >> Once again: the way I interpret this is: * Always enable Link events.
>> >> > >> * Disable presence ev
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 05:18:26PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Rajat Jain wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> Once again: the way I interpret this is: * Always enable Link events.
> >> > >> * Disable presence events if attention button is present.
> >> > >
> >> > > That so
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Rajat Jain wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Once again: the way I interpret this is:
>> > >> * Always enable Link events.
>> > >> * Disable presence events if attention button is present.
>> > >
>> > > That sounds like a good plan to me.
>> >
>> > How about Diag_Reset from MP
> > >
> > >> Once again: the way I interpret this is:
> > >> * Always enable Link events.
> > >> * Disable presence events if attention button is present.
> > >
> > > That sounds like a good plan to me.
> >
> > How about Diag_Reset from MPT2SAS and others?
> > link could up and down
> >
I am assum
Hello,
> -Original Message-
> From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:bhelg...@google.com]
>
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Rajat Jain
> wrote:
> >> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Yinghai Lu
> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Bjorn Helgaas
> >> >
>
> > Also, I think the dev
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 05:58:08PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Rajat Jain wrote:
> >
> >> Once again: the way I interpret this is:
> >> * Always enable Link events.
> >> * Disable presence events if attenti
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Rajat Jain wrote:
>
>> Once again: the way I interpret this is:
>> * Always enable Link events.
>> * Disable presence events if attention button is present.
>
> That sounds like a good plan to me.
How about
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Rajat Jain wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Bjorn Helgaas
> Also, I think the device removal should _always_ be initiated (if not done
> already) whenever the Link goes down for any reason (irr
Hello folks,
Firstly, thanks a lot for taking a look at my patch set.
>
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Bjorn Helgaas
> wrote:
>
> >>> * Define and use interrupt events for linkup / linkdown.
> >>
> >> This seems like a reasonable ide
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> * Define and use interrupt events for linkup / linkdown.
>>
>> This seems like a reasonable idea.
>>
>> In the ExpressCard Standard (Rel 2.0, Feb 2009), Section 6.3.1 and Figure
>> 6-2
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Yinghai]
>
> On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 02:32:46PM -0800, Rajat Jain wrote:
>> A lot of systems do not have the fancy buttons and LEDs, and instead
>> want to rely only on the Link state change events to drive the hotplug
>> and removal sta
[+cc Yinghai]
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 02:32:46PM -0800, Rajat Jain wrote:
> A lot of systems do not have the fancy buttons and LEDs, and instead
> want to rely only on the Link state change events to drive the hotplug
> and removal state machinery.
> (http://www.spinics.net/lists/hotplug/msg05802.
On 12/05/2013 01:07 AM, Yijing Wang wrote:
>
> handle_link_up_event() and handle_link_down_event() are almost the same,
> what about use like:
> handle_link_state_change_event(p_slot, event) to reuse the the common code ?
>
>
Sure, I can combine both of them to make it look more like this. Let m
On 2013/12/4 6:32, Rajat Jain wrote:
> A lot of systems do not have the fancy buttons and LEDs, and instead
> want to rely only on the Link state change events to drive the hotplug
> and removal state machinery.
> (http://www.spinics.net/lists/hotplug/msg05802.html)
>
> This patch adds support for
15 matches
Mail list logo
