On 2021-01-20 5:41 PM, Rojewski, Cezary wrote:
>
> Just checked the history behind this. And must say, I liked Ricardo's
> version better. Except for the "= {};" bit which Mark already pointed
> out - it should be a separate fix - it's simply more optional
Meant to say: optimal.
On 2021-01-20 5:33 PM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> On 1/20/21 9:49 AM, Łukasz Majczak wrote:
>> Hi Pierre,
>>
>> Is there anything more to do to get the ACK for this patch?
>
> Adding Cezary and Amadeusz for feedback, I can't pretend having any sort
> of knowledge on the Skylake driver internal
On 1/20/21 9:49 AM, Łukasz Majczak wrote:
Hi Pierre,
Is there anything more to do to get the ACK for this patch?
Adding Cezary and Amadeusz for feedback, I can't pretend having any sort
of knowledge on the Skylake driver internals and topology usage.
Best regards,
Lukasz
wt., 12 sty 20
Hi Pierre,
Is there anything more to do to get the ACK for this patch?
Best regards,
Lukasz
wt., 12 sty 2021 o 12:34 Łukasz Majczak napisał(a):
>
> Hi,
>
> This is just a kind reminder. Is there anything more required to
> upstream this patch?
>
> Best regards,
> Lukasz
>
>
> czw., 17 gru 2020
Hi,
This is just a kind reminder. Is there anything more required to
upstream this patch?
Best regards,
Lukasz
czw., 17 gru 2020 o 14:06 Lukasz Majczak napisał(a):
>
> There is no check for the kcontrol against NULL and in some cases
> it causes kernel to crash.
>
> Fixes: 2d744ecf2b984 ("ASoC
5 matches
Mail list logo
