China)
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/3] arm64: cpufeature: introduce helper
cpu_has_hw_af()
On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 13:54:47 +0100
Will Deacon wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 09:57:38AM +0800, Jia He wrote:
We unconditionally set the HW_AFDBM capability and only enable it on
CPUs which really have the
Rutland
; James Morse ;
Matthew Wilcox ; Kirill A. Shutemov
; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org;
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux...@kvack.org; Punit Agrawal
; Thomas Gleixner ;
Andrew Morton ; hejia...@gmail.com; Kaly
Xin (Arm Technology China)
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/3] arm64: cpufeature
atthew Wilcox ; Kirill A. Shutemov
> ; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux...@kvack.org; Punit Agrawal
> ; Thomas Gleixner ;
> Andrew Morton ; hejia...@gmail.com; Kaly
> Xin (Arm Technology China)
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/3] arm64: cpufeature:
On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 13:54:47 +0100
Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 09:57:38AM +0800, Jia He wrote:
> > We unconditionally set the HW_AFDBM capability and only enable it on
> > CPUs which really have the feature. But sometimes we need to know
> > whether this cpu has the capability of
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 09:57:38AM +0800, Jia He wrote:
> We unconditionally set the HW_AFDBM capability and only enable it on
> CPUs which really have the feature. But sometimes we need to know
> whether this cpu has the capability of HW AF. So decouple AF from
> DBM by new helper cpu_has_hw_af().
5 matches
Mail list logo