Hello,
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 04:45:08PM -0500, Dennis Zhou wrote:
> I'm not sure I see the reason we can't match the minimum allocation size
> with the unit size? It seems weird to arbitrate the maximum allocation
> size given a lower bound on the unit size.
idk, it can be weird for the maximum
From: Daniel Borkmann
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 16:55:51 +0200
> The set fixes a splat in devmap percpu allocation when we alloc
> the flush bitmap. Patch 1 is a prerequisite for the fix in patch 2,
> patch 1 is rather small, so if this could be routed via -net, for
> example, with Tejun's Ack that
Hi Daniel and Tejun,
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 06:25:26AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Daniel Borkmann (3):
> > mm, percpu: add support for __GFP_NOWARN flag
>
> This looks fine.
>
Looks good to me too.
> > bpf: fix splat for illegal devmap percpu allocation
> > bpf: do not test for PCPU_MI
On 10/18/2017 05:28 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 7:22 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
Higher prio imo would be to make the allocation itself faster
though, I remember we talked about this back in May wrt hashtable,
but I kind of lost track whether there was an update on thi
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 7:22 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>
> Higher prio imo would be to make the allocation itself faster
> though, I remember we talked about this back in May wrt hashtable,
> but I kind of lost track whether there was an update on this in
> the mean time. ;-)
new percpu allocato
On 10/18/2017 04:03 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 10/18/2017 03:25 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello, Daniel.
(cc'ing Dennis)
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 04:55:51PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
The set fixes a splat in devmap percpu allocation when we alloc
the flush bitmap. Patch 1 is a prerequisite f
On 10/18/2017 03:25 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello, Daniel.
(cc'ing Dennis)
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 04:55:51PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
The set fixes a splat in devmap percpu allocation when we alloc
the flush bitmap. Patch 1 is a prerequisite for the fix in patch 2,
patch 1 is rather small,
Hello, Daniel.
(cc'ing Dennis)
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 04:55:51PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> The set fixes a splat in devmap percpu allocation when we alloc
> the flush bitmap. Patch 1 is a prerequisite for the fix in patch 2,
> patch 1 is rather small, so if this could be routed via -net, f
On 10/17/2017 05:03 PM, David Laight wrote:
From: Daniel Borkmann
Sent: 17 October 2017 15:56
The set fixes a splat in devmap percpu allocation when we alloc
the flush bitmap. Patch 1 is a prerequisite for the fix in patch 2,
patch 1 is rather small, so if this could be routed via -net, for
exa
From: Daniel Borkmann
> Sent: 17 October 2017 15:56
>
> The set fixes a splat in devmap percpu allocation when we alloc
> the flush bitmap. Patch 1 is a prerequisite for the fix in patch 2,
> patch 1 is rather small, so if this could be routed via -net, for
> example, with Tejun's Ack that would b
10 matches
Mail list logo
