Hi Jassi,
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 2/2] mailbox: introduce ARM SMC based mailbox
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 5:00 AM Andre Przywara
> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > + };
> > > > > +};
> > > >
> > > > If
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 8:58 AM Andre Przywara wrote:
>
> > > Also there is mbox_chan_txdone() with which a controller driver can
> > > signal TX completion explicitly.
> > >
> > No. Controller can use that only if it has specified txdone_irq, which
> > is not the case here.
>
> I see. So does t
On Wed, 18 Sep 2019 08:31:57 -0500
Jassi Brar wrote:
Hi,
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 5:00 AM Andre Przywara wrote:
>
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > + };
> > > > > +};
> > > >
> > > > If this is the data structure that this mailbox controller uses, I
> > > > would expect
> > > > this to be docume
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 5:00 AM Andre Przywara wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > > + };
> > > > +};
> > >
> > > If this is the data structure that this mailbox controller uses, I would
> > > expect
> > > this to be documented somewhere, or even exported.
> >
> > Export this structure in include/linux/mailb
On Wed, 18 Sep 2019 09:09:25 +
Peng Fan wrote:
Hi,
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 2/2] mailbox: introduce ARM SMC based mailbox
> >
> > On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 09:44:41 +
> > Peng Fan wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > looks quite good now, some sm
Hi Andre,
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 2/2] mailbox: introduce ARM SMC based mailbox
>
> On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 09:44:41 +
> Peng Fan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> looks quite good now, some smaller comments below.
> I think the only thing left is the "function ID passed by
On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 09:44:41 +
Peng Fan wrote:
Hi,
looks quite good now, some smaller comments below.
I think the only thing left is the "function ID passed by the client" topic.
Have you tried using this interface using hvc, for instance in KVM or Xen? For
instance to provide access to a
7 matches
Mail list logo
