On 2019.08.02 02:12 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 7:44 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>
>> To avoid reducing the frequency of a CPU prematurely, we skip reducing
>> the frequency if the CPU had been busy recently.
>>
>> This should not be done when the limits of the policy are changed
On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 7:44 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> To avoid reducing the frequency of a CPU prematurely, we skip reducing
> the frequency if the CPU had been busy recently.
>
> This should not be done when the limits of the policy are changed, for
> example due to thermal throttling. We should
2 matches
Mail list logo