t;Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 01/16] prcu: Add PRCU implementation
>
>On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 05:34:03AM +, zhangheng (AC) wrote:
>[...]
>> >> > +static void prcu_handler(void *info) {
>> >> > + struct prcu_local_struct *local;
>> >> > +
&g
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 05:34:03AM +, zhangheng (AC) wrote:
[...]
> >> > +static void prcu_handler(void *info) {
> >> > +struct prcu_local_struct *local;
> >> > +
> >> > +local = this_cpu_ptr(&prcu_local);
> >> > +if (!local->locked)
> >
> >And I think a smp_mb() is need
ao.li...@gmail.com; LKML
>
>Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 01/16] prcu: Add PRCU implementation
>
>On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 3:59 PM, wrote:
>> From: Heng Zhang
>>
>> This RCU implementation (PRCU) is based on a fast consensus protocol
>> published in the following pape
t;Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 01/16] prcu: Add PRCU implementation
>
>On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:16:18PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 03:59:26PM +0800, liangli...@huawei.com wrote:
>> > From: Heng Zhang
>> >
>> > This RCU
bo, OS Lab)
; lihao.li...@gmail.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH RFC 01/16] prcu: Add PRCU implementation
Hi Paul, thanks a lot for pointing out the problems of the implementation.
Here's my understanding.
Best Regards,
Heng
-Original Message-
>From: Paul E. McK
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 3:59 PM, wrote:
> From: Heng Zhang
>
> This RCU implementation (PRCU) is based on a fast consensus protocol
> published in the following paper:
>
> Fast Consensus Using Bounded Staleness for Scalable Read-mostly
> Synchronization.
> Haibo Chen, Heng Zhang, Ran Liu, Binyu
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 6:16 AM, Paul E. McKenney
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 03:59:26PM +0800, liangli...@huawei.com wrote:
>> From: Heng Zhang
>>
>> This RCU implementation (PRCU) is based on a fast consensus protocol
>> published in the following paper:
>>
>> Fast Consensus Using Bounded
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:16:18PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 03:59:26PM +0800, liangli...@huawei.com wrote:
> > From: Heng Zhang
> >
> > This RCU implementation (PRCU) is based on a fast consensus protocol
> > published in the following paper:
> >
> > Fast Consensu
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 03:59:26PM +0800, liangli...@huawei.com wrote:
> From: Heng Zhang
>
> This RCU implementation (PRCU) is based on a fast consensus protocol
> published in the following paper:
>
> Fast Consensus Using Bounded Staleness for Scalable Read-mostly
> Synchronization.
> Haibo C
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 05:15:30PM +, Lihao Liang wrote:
> Alternatively, the paper can be found at
>
> http://ipads.se.sjtu.edu.cn/lib/exe/fetch.php?media=publications:consensus-tpds16.pdf
Thanks, I'll try and have a read.
Dear Peter,
Many thanks for your comments. I will provide a proper changelog.
Alternatively, the paper can be found at
http://ipads.se.sjtu.edu.cn/lib/exe/fetch.php?media=publications:consensus-tpds16.pdf
Best,
Lihao.
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 11:26 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 20
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 03:59:26PM +0800, liangli...@huawei.com wrote:
> From: Heng Zhang
>
> This RCU implementation (PRCU) is based on a fast consensus protocol
> published in the following paper:
>
> Fast Consensus Using Bounded Staleness for Scalable Read-mostly
> Synchronization.
> Haibo C
12 matches
Mail list logo
