Re: [PATCH 2.6.11.6] Add power cycle to ipmi_poweroff module

2005-04-08 Thread Corey Minyard
ey Minyard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 10:35 AM To: Poblete, Chris Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.11.6] Add power cycle to ipmi_poweroff module [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Below is a patch to add "power cycle" f

RE: [PATCH 2.6.11.6] Add power cycle to ipmi_poweroff module

2005-04-08 Thread Shawn Starr
Shouldn't IPMI be using /sys instead /proc? I thought we're trying to cleanup /proc? --- List: linux-kernel Subject:RE: [PATCH 2.6.11.6] Add power cycle to ipmi_poweroff module From: Date: 2005-04-08 15:53:54 Message-ID: [Download message RAW] T

RE: [PATCH 2.6.11.6] Add power cycle to ipmi_poweroff module

2005-04-08 Thread Chris_Poblete
odule. Thanks, -Chris Poblete -Original Message- From: Corey Minyard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 10:35 AM To: Poblete, Chris Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.11.6] Add power cycle to ipmi_poweroff module [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PATCH 2.6.11.6] Add power cycle to ipmi_poweroff module

2005-04-08 Thread Corey Minyard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Below is a patch to add "power cycle" functionality to the IPMI power off module ipmi_poweroff. A new module param is added to support this: parmtype: do_power_cycle:int parm: do_power_cycle: Set to 1 to enable power cycle instead of power down. Power cycle