Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: pcm512x: Allow independently overclocking PLL, DAC and DSP

2015-02-23 Thread Peter Rosin
From: Peter Rosin On 2015-02-23 15:31, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 12:24:12AM +, Peter Rosin wrote: > >> ...but I'm not sure everybody agrees that overclocking games should >> be allowed by any and all users? > > I don't see why not, ASoC controls are already way beyond end

Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: pcm512x: Allow independently overclocking PLL, DAC and DSP

2015-02-23 Thread Mark Brown
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 12:24:12AM +, Peter Rosin wrote: > ...but I'm not sure everybody agrees that overclocking games should > be allowed by any and all users? I don't see why not, ASoC controls are already way beyond end user a lot of the time. > If you still want me to convert to ALSA co

RE: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: pcm512x: Allow independently overclocking PLL, DAC and DSP

2015-02-21 Thread Peter Rosin
Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:02:48PM +0100, Peter Rosin wrote: > > From: Peter Rosin > > > > When using non-standard rates, a relatively small amount of > > overclocking can make a big difference to a number of cases. > > This is all basically fine but I'm wondering why this is

Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: pcm512x: Allow independently overclocking PLL, DAC and DSP

2015-02-21 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:02:48PM +0100, Peter Rosin wrote: > From: Peter Rosin > > When using non-standard rates, a relatively small amount of overclocking > can make a big difference to a number of cases. This is all basically fine but I'm wondering why this is being configured via sysfs and