Jerry Hoemann writes:
> The ndn_pkg.buf struct uses a flexible array definition. This is in C99.
> An explicit zero length array is a gcc extension that has been around much
> longer. They behave in a similar fashion, but aren't identical. In my
> limited use they behave the same.
I could sw
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Jerry Hoemann wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 03:26:38PM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote:
[..]
>> I see. I misread that, because you didn't actually make buf a zero
>> length array (see the structure definition quoted above). I guess you
>> meant to write this:
>>
>>
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 03:26:38PM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> >
> > The definition for the IOCTLs are in a user space application.
> > These aren't required in the kernel as the kernel is only a
> > pass thru.
>
> OK, I don't see the harm in including it in the kernel headers, but I'm
> not going
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Linda Knippers wrote:
> On 11/10/2015 3:27 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Jerry Hoemann
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:51:59PM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote:
Jerry Hoemann writes:
> Add IOCTL type 'P' t
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:04:22PM -0700, Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory)
wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Linux-nvdimm [mailto:linux-nvdimm-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
> > Hoemann, Jerry
> > Sent: Friday, November 6, 2015 4:27 PM
> > Subject: [PATCH 1/4] nvdimm: Add wrap
On 11/10/2015 3:27 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Jerry Hoemann wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:51:59PM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote:
Jerry Hoemann writes:
Add IOCTL type 'P' to denote NVDIMM_TYPE_PASSTHRU.
Can't you just make passthrough a separate command? If yo
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Jerry Hoemann wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:51:59PM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>> Jerry Hoemann writes:
>>
>> > Add IOCTL type 'P' to denote NVDIMM_TYPE_PASSTHRU.
>>
>> Can't you just make passthrough a separate command? If you actually add
>
> There are mul
Jerry Hoemann writes:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:51:59PM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>> Jerry Hoemann writes:
>>
>> > Add IOCTL type 'P' to denote NVDIMM_TYPE_PASSTHRU.
>>
>> Can't you just make passthrough a separate command? If you actually add
>
> There are multiple conflicting NVDIMM _DSM
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:51:59PM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Jerry Hoemann writes:
>
> > Add IOCTL type 'P' to denote NVDIMM_TYPE_PASSTHRU.
>
> Can't you just make passthrough a separate command? If you actually add
There are multiple conflicting NVDIMM _DSM running around, they
are "device s
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux-nvdimm [mailto:linux-nvdimm-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
> Hoemann, Jerry
> Sent: Friday, November 6, 2015 4:27 PM
> Subject: [PATCH 1/4] nvdimm: Add wrapper for IOCTL pass thru.
...
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/ndctl.h b/include/uapi/linux/ndct
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Jerry Hoemann writes:
>
>> Add IOCTL type 'P' to denote NVDIMM_TYPE_PASSTHRU.
>
> Can't you just make passthrough a separate command? If you actually add
> the ioctl definition for passthrough (which you didn't do for some
> reason?), it looks
Jerry Hoemann writes:
> Add IOCTL type 'P' to denote NVDIMM_TYPE_PASSTHRU.
Can't you just make passthrough a separate command? If you actually add
the ioctl definition for passthrough (which you didn't do for some
reason?), it looks odd:
#define ND_IOCTL_PASSTHRU_IOWR(NVDIMM_TYPE_PASST
12 matches
Mail list logo