On 18/11/15 16:45, Hartley Sweeten wrote:
On Wednesday, November 18, 2015 9:42 AM, Ian Abbott wrote:
On 16/11/15 17:18, Ranjith Thangavel wrote:
[snip]
-#define DMM32AT_AI_CFG_SCINT_20US (0 << 4)
-#define DMM32AT_AI_CFG_SCINT_15US (1 << 4)
-#define DMM32AT_AI_CFG_SCINT_10US (2
On Wednesday, November 18, 2015 9:42 AM, Ian Abbott wrote:
> On 16/11/15 17:18, Ranjith Thangavel wrote:
[snip]
>> -#define DMM32AT_AI_CFG_SCINT_20US (0 << 4)
>> -#define DMM32AT_AI_CFG_SCINT_15US (1 << 4)
>> -#define DMM32AT_AI_CFG_SCINT_10US (2 << 4)
>> -#define DMM32AT_AI_CFG_SCINT_5US
On 16/11/15 17:18, Ranjith Thangavel wrote:
BIT macro is used for defining BIT location instead of
shifting operator, usleep_range is preferred over
udelay - coding style issue
This patch doesn't use usleep_range(), so the description is inaccurate.
Signed-off-by: Ranjith Thangavel
---
dr
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:48:27PM +0530, Ranjith Thangavel wrote:
> BIT macro is used for defining BIT location instead of
> shifting operator, usleep_range is preferred over
> udelay - coding style issue
>
> Signed-off-by: Ranjith Thangavel
> ---
I am not seeing any change related to udelay. C
4 matches
Mail list logo