RE: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI / PM: Use Low Power S0 Idle on more systems

2018-01-11 Thread Mario.Limonciello
henko ; > Darren Hart ; Linux Kernel Mailing List ker...@vger.kernel.org>; Linux PM ; Platform Driver > ; v...@mrs.ro > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI / PM: Use Low Power S0 Idle on more systems > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 6:38 PM, wrote: > > > > > >>

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI / PM: Use Low Power S0 Idle on more systems

2018-01-11 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 23:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 2:24 PM, Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 13:26 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Just a nitpick: Can we leave S2IDLE instead of S2I? > > Would it make sense for potential code readers? > >

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI / PM: Use Low Power S0 Idle on more systems

2018-01-10 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 2:24 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 13:26 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> From: Rafael J. Wysocki >> >> Some systems don't support the ACPI_LPS0_ENTRY and ACPI_LPS0_EXIT >> functions in their Low Power S0 Idle _DSM, but still expect EC >> events to b

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI / PM: Use Low Power S0 Idle on more systems

2018-01-10 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 6:38 PM, wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: platform-driver-x86-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:platform-driver-x86- >> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Rafael J. Wysocki >> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 6:26 AM >> To: Linux ACPI >> Cc: Andy Shevchenko

RE: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI / PM: Use Low Power S0 Idle on more systems

2018-01-10 Thread Mario.Limonciello
> -Original Message- > From: platform-driver-x86-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:platform-driver-x86- > ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Rafael J. Wysocki > Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 6:26 AM > To: Linux ACPI > Cc: Andy Shevchenko ; Darren Hart > ; LKML ; Linux PM p...@vger.kern

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI / PM: Use Low Power S0 Idle on more systems

2018-01-10 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 13:26 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > Some systems don't support the ACPI_LPS0_ENTRY and ACPI_LPS0_EXIT > functions in their Low Power S0 Idle _DSM, but still expect EC > events to be processed in the suspend-to-idle state for power button > wak