On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 07:51:26AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 4:13 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 06:00:08PM +, Luck, Tony wrote:
> >> That's fine with me. Boris ... any comments?
> >
> > Same here:
> >
> > Acked-by: Borislav Petkov
> >
> >
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 07:51:26AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> When does Paul usually send the rcu pull request? I can send these as
> a pull request or an emailed series after that happens.
I'd put a note in the pull request for tip guys to pull after Paul's
pull req., for example.
Thanks.
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 4:13 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 06:00:08PM +, Luck, Tony wrote:
>> That's fine with me. Boris ... any comments?
>
> Same here:
>
> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov
>
> I like negative diffstats:
>
> include/asm/mce.h |1
> include/asm/th
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 06:00:08PM +, Luck, Tony wrote:
> That's fine with me. Boris ... any comments?
Same here:
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov
I like negative diffstats:
include/asm/mce.h |1
include/asm/thread_info.h |4 -
kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 109 ++
> For the context-related bits:
>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Lutomirski
Thanks.
> Should I stick this in my -next branch so it can stew?
That's fine with me. Boris ... any comments?
-Tony
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Luck, Tony wrote:
> We now switch to the kernel stack when a machine check interrupts
> during user mode. This means that we can perform recovery actions
> in the tail of do_machine_check()
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck
>
> ---
> On top of Andy's x86/paranoid branc
6 matches
Mail list logo
