..@kernel.org]
> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 11:08 PM
> To: tianxianting (RD)
> Cc: ax...@fb.com; h...@lst.de; s...@grimberg.me;
> linux-n...@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: replace meaningless judgement by checking
> whe
8 PM
> To: tianxianting (RD)
> Cc: ax...@fb.com; h...@lst.de; s...@grimberg.me;
> linux-n...@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: replace meaningless judgement by checking whether
> req is null
>
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:10:52AM +0800, Xiantin
, 2020 11:08 PM
To: tianxianting (RD)
Cc: ax...@fb.com; h...@lst.de; s...@grimberg.me;
linux-n...@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: replace meaningless judgement by checking whether
req is null
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:10:52AM +0800, Xianting Tian w
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:10:52AM +0800, Xianting Tian wrote:
> @@ -940,13 +940,6 @@ static inline void nvme_handle_cqe(struct nvme_queue
> *nvmeq, u16 idx)
> struct nvme_completion *cqe = &nvmeq->cqes[idx];
> struct request *req;
>
> - if (unlikely(cqe->command_id >= nvmeq->q_d
Thanks, this looks much more sensible than the previous versions.
5 matches
Mail list logo