Jonathan Cameron 於 2018年11月25日 週日 下午9:23寫道：
>
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 13:13:40 +0800
> Jian-Hong Pan wrote:
>
> > Denis CIOCCA 於 2018年11月20日 週二 上午3:05寫道：
> > >
> > > Hi Jian,
> > >
> > > Not clear to me why should be + instead of *.
> > >
> > > ODR is expressed in Hz, so (1/Hz) = period in seconds
On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 13:13:40 +0800
Jian-Hong Pan wrote:
> Denis CIOCCA 於 2018年11月20日 週二 上午3:05寫道：
> >
> > Hi Jian,
> >
> > Not clear to me why should be + instead of *.
> >
> > ODR is expressed in Hz, so (1/Hz) = period in seconds (1 sample sampling
> > time) [s]
> > 1000 * (1/Hz) = period in m
Denis CIOCCA 於 2018年11月20日 週二 上午3:05寫道：
>
> Hi Jian,
>
> Not clear to me why should be + instead of *.
>
> ODR is expressed in Hz, so (1/Hz) = period in seconds (1 sample sampling
> time) [s]
> 1000 * (1/Hz) = period in milliseconds (1 sample sampling time) [ms]
> n * 1000 * (1/Hz) = n times peri
Hi Jian,
Not clear to me why should be + instead of *.
ODR is expressed in Hz, so (1/Hz) = period in seconds (1 sample sampling time)
[s]
1000 * (1/Hz) = period in milliseconds (1 sample sampling time) [ms]
n * 1000 * (1/Hz) = n times period in milliseconds (n times sample sampling
time) [ms]
4 matches
Mail list logo
