--- Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also is there a reason you don't want to pass down the various
> other ioctls scsi_cmd_ioctl can handle to it?
Didn't think about it, SG_IO is the one people were
clamoring for.
SG_GET_VERSION_NUM:
easily doable.
SCSI_IOCTL_GET_IDLUN:
Hmm, cc
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 10:07:52AM -0700, Stephen Cameron wrote:
> How about something like this:
> (Since my mailer is sure to wreck the patch, it can be found intact here:
> http://cciss.cvs.sourceforge.net/*checkout*/cciss/patches/kernel.org-2.6/cciss_sg_io_block_pc.patch?revision=1.1
Looks goo
Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> this patch adds the SG_IO ioctl to the cciss driver.
> As the driver is capable of sending SCSI CDBs to the controller there is
> no reason why we shouldn't exploit it.
> This way we get to use all the nice sg_utils for the cciss driver.
> And a persistent device name for
James wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 11:03 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 11:58:06AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > this patch adds the SG_IO ioctl to the cciss driver.
> > > As the driver is capable of sending SCSI CDBs to the controller
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 11:03 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 11:58:06AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > this patch adds the SG_IO ioctl to the cciss driver.
> > As the driver is capable of sending SCSI CDBs to the controller there is
> > no reason why we
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 11:58:06AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> this patch adds the SG_IO ioctl to the cciss driver.
> As the driver is capable of sending SCSI CDBs to the controller there is
> no reason why we shouldn't exploit it.
> This way we get to use all the nice sg_utils for
6 matches
Mail list logo
