On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 13:56:24, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 10:25:17AM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> > On 07/24/2012 08:51 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > >
> > > How about the following?
> > >
> > > /**
> > > * enum pwm_polarity - polarity of a PWM signal
> > > * @PWM_
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 10:25:17AM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 07/24/2012 08:51 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >
> > How about the following?
> >
> > /**
> > * enum pwm_polarity - polarity of a PWM signal
> > * @PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL: a high signal for the duration of the duty-
> > * cy
On 07/24/2012 08:51 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
>
> How about the following?
>
> /**
> * enum pwm_polarity - polarity of a PWM signal
> * @PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL: a high signal for the duration of the duty-
> * cycle, followed by a low signal for the remainder of the pulse
> * period
> * @PWM
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:15:07PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 07/23/2012 10:30 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 06:24:13PM +0530, Philip, Avinash wrote:
> >>[...]
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/pwm.h b/include/linux/pwm.h
> >> index 21d076c..2e4e960 100644
> >> ---
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 01:22:49, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 03:05:26PM +, Philip, Avinash wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 18:38:25, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:51:11PM +, Philip, Avinash wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 14:00:32, Thi
On 07/23/2012 10:30 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 06:24:13PM +0530, Philip, Avinash wrote:
>>[...]
>> diff --git a/include/linux/pwm.h b/include/linux/pwm.h
>> index 21d076c..2e4e960 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/pwm.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/pwm.h
>> @@ -21,6 +21,16 @@ void pw
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 03:05:26PM +, Philip, Avinash wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 18:38:25, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:51:11PM +, Philip, Avinash wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 14:00:32, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 06:24:13PM +0
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 18:38:25, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:51:11PM +, Philip, Avinash wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 14:00:32, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 06:24:13PM +0530, Philip, Avinash wrote:
> [...]
> > > > +
> > > > + if (test_bi
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:51:11PM +, Philip, Avinash wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 14:00:32, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 06:24:13PM +0530, Philip, Avinash wrote:
[...]
> > > +
> > > + if (test_bit(PWMF_ENABLED, &pwm->flags)) {
> > > + dev_err(pwm->chip->dev,
>
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 14:00:32, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 06:24:13PM +0530, Philip, Avinash wrote:
> > Duty cycle inversion of PWM wave should achieved through PWM polarity
> > inversion. Also polarity of PWM wave should configurable from slave
> > drivers,
>
> Actually, I
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 06:24:13PM +0530, Philip, Avinash wrote:
> Duty cycle inversion of PWM wave should achieved through PWM polarity
> inversion. Also polarity of PWM wave should configurable from slave
> drivers,
Actually, I don't think that duty cycle inversion *should* be achieved
through p
11 matches
Mail list logo