RE: [PATCH] IPROUTE: Modify tc for new PRIO multiqueue behavior

2007-04-26 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Apr 25 2007 10:45, Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P wrote: >> >> BTW, is there any reason this is being cced to lkml? > >Since this change affects how tc interacts with the qdisc layer, I cced >lkml. Fine with me, at least I get to know that tc could break :) Jan -- - To unsubscribe from this list:

RE: [PATCH] IPROUTE: Modify tc for new PRIO multiqueue behavior

2007-04-25 Thread Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
ok, Auke-jan H; Leech, Christopher; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPROUTE: Modify tc for new PRIO > multiqueue behavior > > On Tue, 2007-24-04 at 21:05 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > Peter P Waskiewicz Jr wrote: > > > Only if this binary compatiable with

Re: [PATCH] IPROUTE: Modify tc for new PRIO multiqueue behavior

2007-04-25 Thread jamal
On Tue, 2007-24-04 at 21:05 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Peter P Waskiewicz Jr wrote: > Only if this binary compatiable with older kernels. It is not. But i think that is a lesser problem, the bigger question is: Why would you need to change a qdisc just so you can support egress multiqueues

Re: [PATCH] IPROUTE: Modify tc for new PRIO multiqueue behavior

2007-04-24 Thread Stephen Hemminger
Peter P Waskiewicz Jr wrote: From: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Modified tc so PRIO can now have a multiqueue parameter passed to it. This will turn on multiqueue behavior if a device has more than 1 queue. Also, running tc qdisc ls dev will display if multiqueue is on or off. S