On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 04:35:40PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 07:31:09AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 10:21:51AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 03:00:02PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > Hello!
> > > >
> >
On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 07:31:09AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 10:21:51AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 03:00:02PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > The header comment for for_each_domain() talks about a call to
> > > sy
On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 10:21:51AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 03:00:02PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > The header comment for for_each_domain() talks about a call to
> > synchronize_sched() within detach_destroy_domains(), but I am not
> > seeing any
On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 03:00:02PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Hello!
>
> The header comment for for_each_domain() talks about a call to
> synchronize_sched() within detach_destroy_domains(), but I am not
> seeing any such call. Because synchronize_sched() is now folded into
> synchronize_rc
Hello!
The header comment for for_each_domain() talks about a call to
synchronize_sched() within detach_destroy_domains(), but I am not
seeing any such call. Because synchronize_sched() is now folded into
synchronize_rcu(), I have a patch that edits the comment, but it looks
like a larger change
5 matches
Mail list logo