Re: Promise 20267 "working" but no UDMA

2001-04-03 Thread Juhani Rautiainen
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Ruth Ivimey-Cook wrote: > At 04:57 PM 4/3/01, you wrote: > >I have no choice since the motherboard has the chip on-board and with > >FastTrack BIOS. > > Ahh. I understand. > > I didn't know these MBs had the FastTrak BIOS built in; I was assuming you > were using the PCI ca

Re: Promise 20267 "working" but no UDMA

2001-04-03 Thread Ruth Ivimey-Cook
At 04:57 PM 4/3/01, you wrote: >I have no choice since the motherboard has the chip on-board and with >FastTrack BIOS. Ahh. I understand. I didn't know these MBs had the FastTrak BIOS built in; I was assuming you were using the PCI card. Ruth -- Ruth Ivimey-Cook [EMAIL

Re: Promise 20267 "working" but no UDMA

2001-04-03 Thread Andrew Chan
> Is the issue here about the Promise FastTrack BIOS messing things up? If > so, why use it, rather than the Promise Ultra100 BIOS, which seems to be > fine (again, AFAIK). Ultra100 is okay. FastTrack is not. I have no choice since the motherboard has the chip on-board and with FastTrack BIOS.

Re: Promise 20267 "working" but no UDMA

2001-04-03 Thread Ruth Ivimey-Cook
At 12:13 PM 4/1/01, you wrote: >Anybody manage to get UDMA 66/100 working with an on-board Promise 20267 >chip? I'm a bit confused by this thread. I have two PDC2067 chips in my fileserver, both on Ultra100 boards and connected to 4 x 30Gb IBM deskstar disks. I have it set up as one 15GB and on

RE: Promise 20267 "working" but no UDMA

2001-04-02 Thread Nerijus Baliunas
> > PDC20267: (U)DMA Burst Bit ENABLED Primary MASTER Mode Secondary MASTER Mode. How does MASTER mode differ from PCI? I have: PDC20267: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 50 PDC20267: chipset revision 2 PDC20267: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later PDC20267: ROM enabled at 0xe800 PDC

Re: Promise 20267 "working" but no UDMA

2001-04-02 Thread Andrew Chan
Actually, upon further testing, I found that the MB will move on without an Fasttrack array. However, it will proceed to boot from PXE because it now thinks that there is no hard disk attached to the entire system (as reported by the Promise RAID chip)! So, 1. Promise driver doesn't support SMP

Re: Promise 20267 "working" but no UDMA

2001-04-02 Thread Andrew Chan
Andre Hedrick says: >> FastTrack config: only 1 drive, configured as a SPAN volume consisting of 1 drive > No RAIDing allowed in the FTTK Bios. But my motherboard hangs at boot time (while Fasttrack tests for arrays) if there is no array defined! There is a message from the Fasttrack bios that

Re: Promise 20267 "working" but no UDMA

2001-04-02 Thread Andre Hedrick
On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Andrew Chan wrote: > Anybody manage to get UDMA 66/100 working with an on-board Promise 20267 > chip? > > Hardware: Tyan Tiger LE (with ServerWorks OSB4 _and_ Promise 20267 on-board) > > Kernel: 2.4.3 with ide.2.4.3-p8.all.03242001.patch by Andre Hedrick (or > stock 2.4.3 wi

Promise 20267 "working" but no UDMA

2001-04-01 Thread Andrew Chan
Anybody manage to get UDMA 66/100 working with an on-board Promise 20267 chip? Hardware: Tyan Tiger LE (with ServerWorks OSB4 _and_ Promise 20267 on-board) Kernel: 2.4.3 with ide.2.4.3-p8.all.03242001.patch by Andre Hedrick (or stock 2.4.3 with more or less same results) FastTrack config: only