Patrick Mackinlay :
If your use redhat 7.0 ;Your will check the kernel "Makefile" ,change the gcc
to kgcc , Try again !
Update the gcc from http://www.redhat.com/
> <_EIP>:
>Code; d2cf9db8 <[reiserfs]create_virtual_node+298/490> <=
> 0: 8b 40 14
When 2.4.1 was released I reported a kernel oops with reiserfs, I got no
response.
The problem still persists with kernel 2.4.2. I am using mkreiserfs v2
(3.6.25) and tried on different ide hards disks as well as on a software
raid 0 partition, I also tried with and without CONFIG_REISERFS_CHECK
d
> " " == Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - cannot do ".." lookups efficiently, or doesn't want to and
> - can protect against this sort of loop (and any other issues
>that
> the VFS usually protects against) itself
> then it can (with my patch) simpl
On Tuesday February 20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Neil Brown wrote:
>
> > 2/ lookup("..").
>
> A small question:
> Why exactly is this needed?
>
> bye, Roman
Having read the subsequent posts, I now see what you are thinking and
know how to answer this.
The probl
On Wednesday, February 21, 2001 09:54:19 AM +1100 Brian May
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "dek" == dek ml <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> dek> OK so I think what I can take from this is: for kernel 2.4 in
> dek> the foreseeable future, reiserfs over NFS won't work without
> dek
> "dek" == dek ml <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
dek> OK so I think what I can take from this is: for kernel 2.4 in
dek> the foreseeable future, reiserfs over NFS won't work without
dek> a special patch. And, filesystems other than ext2 in general
Does this apply to the user space
Hi,
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> If I read the code correctly, we set the dentry d_flag
> DCACHE_NFSD_DISCONNECTED on such dummy dentries. We only force a
> lookup of the full path if the inode represents a directory or the
> NFSEXP_NOSUBTREECHECK export flag is not set.
IMO y
> " " == Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If I read the source correctly, namespace operation are done
> with dir file handle + file name. I'm playing with the idea if
> we could relax the rule, that all dentries must be connected to
> the root. Inode to dentry l
Hi,
On 20 Feb 2001, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> IIRC several NFS implementations (not Linux though) rely on being able
> to walk back up the directory tree in order to discover the path at
> any given moment.
If I read the source correctly, namespace operation are done with dir file
handle + file
> " " == Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Neil Brown wrote:
>> 2/ lookup("..").
> A small question: Why exactly is this needed?
Short answer: the existence of 'rename' makes it necessary, since it
means that the directory path is volatile as
Hi,
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Neil Brown wrote:
> 2/ lookup("..").
A small question:
Why exactly is this needed?
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordo
Alan Cox writes:
>> This may seem like a lot, but several of these are already
>> requirements which most filesystems don't meet, and other are there
>> to tidy-up interfaces and make locking more straight forward.
>
>As a 2.5 thing it sounds like a very sensible path. It will also provide
>som
On Tuesday February 20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > This may seem like a lot, but several of these are already
> > requirements which most filesystems don't meet, and other are there
> > to tidy-up interfaces and make locking more straight forward.
>
> As a 2.5 thing it sounds like a very sen
On Monday February 19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, February 20, 2001 11:40:24 AM +1100 Neil Brown
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > When reiserfs came along, it abused this, and re-interpreted the
> > opaque datum to contain information for recalling (locating) an
> > in
> This may seem like a lot, but several of these are already
> requirements which most filesystems don't meet, and other are there
> to tidy-up interfaces and make locking more straight forward.
As a 2.5 thing it sounds like a very sensible path. It will also provide
some of the operations gro
On Tuesday, February 20, 2001 11:40:24 AM +1100 Neil Brown
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When reiserfs came along, it abused this, and re-interpreted the
> opaque datum to contain information for recalling (locating) an
> inode - if read_inode2 was defined. I think this is wrong.
>
I s
On Monday February 19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I hope to put out a patch set for testing in a day or so and possibly
> > suggest it to Alan for his -ac series. I don't see it going into
> > 2.4.2, but 2.4.3 might be possible if Linus agrees.
>
> Im not interested in a patch that requires NF
On Monday, February 19, 2001 01:55:57 AM + Alan Cox
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> it had been cleared up. In particular, the Configure.help in 2.4.2-pre4
>> says "reiserfs can be used for anything that ext2 can be used for".
>
> The configure.help is wrong on that and one other thing. NFS
> I hope to put out a patch set for testing in a day or so and possibly
> suggest it to Alan for his -ac series. I don't see it going into
> 2.4.2, but 2.4.3 might be possible if Linus agrees.
Im not interested in a patch that requires NFS is hacked for each file system
that tells me the impleme
On Sunday February 18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> OK, I grabbed these patches and applied them against 2.4.2-pre4 and
> recompiled, rebooted. I am now able to use reiserfs with NFS,
> basic operations appear to work as expected but I haven't done large amounts
> of file IO or lots of concurren
Neil Brown writes:
>On Sunday February 18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I migrated some exported disks over to reiserfs and had no luck when I
>> mounted the disk via NFS on another machine. I've noticed many messages
>> about reiser and NFS in the archives, but my understanding was
> it had been cleared up. In particular, the Configure.help in 2.4.2-pre4
> says "reiserfs can be used for anything that ext2 can be used for".
The configure.help is wrong on that and one other thing. NFS doesnt work
without extra patches and big endian boxes dont work with reiserfs currently
C
On Sunday February 18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I migrated some exported disks over to reiserfs and had no luck when I
> mounted the disk via NFS on another machine. I've noticed many messages
> about reiser and NFS in the archives, but my understanding was that
> it had been cleare
Hi,
I migrated some exported disks over to reiserfs and had no luck when I
mounted the disk via NFS on another machine. I've noticed many messages
about reiser and NFS in the archives, but my understanding was that
it had been cleared up. In particular, the Configure.help in 2.4.2-pre4
says "r
24 matches
Mail list logo
