[Solved] Re: Problems even with 512 block size MOs

2001-05-07 Thread Uwe Bonnes
Hallo, I am very sorry that I didn't mention that I ran Hubert Mantels modified kernels when I had that problem. I now found in Hubert's Changelog: --- Sat May 5 15:17:10 CEST 2001 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... - fix max-sectors patch (fi

Re: Problems even with 512 block size MOs

2001-05-06 Thread Giuliano Pochini
> recent 2.4 kernels have incredible bad performance for me when handling MO > drives. Going back 2.2 shows better performance. > Copying a 6.5 MByte file with cp returns nearly immediately on the > commandline, but umount nearly takes forever. Maximum rate detected by > xosview during umount wa

Re: Problems even with 512 block size MOs

2001-05-02 Thread Alan Cox
> Copying a 6.5 MByte file with cp returns nearly immediately on the > commandline, but umount nearly takes forever. Maximum rate detected by > xosview during umount was about 30 kByte. > > I have similar behaviour on another machine and with different disk. However > I don't get any "dmesg" outp

Problems even with 512 block size MOs

2001-05-02 Thread Uwe Bonnes
Hallo recent 2.4 kernels have incredible bad performance for me when handling MO drives. Going back 2.2 shows better performance. This is my setup: SCSI subsystem driver Revision: 1.00 ncr53c8xx: at PCI bus 0, device 15, function 0 ncr53c8xx: 53c810 detected ncr53c810-0: rev 0x2 on pci bus 0 de