Hi,
I guess there are no simple answers... Below I have 3 different answers to
my
previous questions. As they relate to the same problem,I descided to put
them togheter in this mail.
Mark Hahn don't realy seams to agree with Andre about if noapic is
crippling
the system or not.
Alan Cox says t
Hi Andre,
The motherboard has VIA-chipset.
What does this mean for me?
Will the APIC-problems be solved in the future or do I have to deside upon
running "noapic" semi-crippled or not run Ultra-DMA?
_\\|//_
(-0-0-)
/
:: If this is a VIA SMP system there are APIC problems that you
:: do not want
:: to even think about addressing.
::
:: MPS1.1 and passing "noapic" will fix most of there mess, but
:: you have a
:: semi-crippled system, but it runs.
Andre,
I don't suppose these APIC problems are documented an
If this is a VIA SMP system there are APIC problems that you do not want
to even think about addressing.
MPS1.1 and passing "noapic" will fix most of there mess, but you have a
semi-crippled system, but it runs.
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi once more...
>
> I'm sorry for t
Hi once more...
I'm sorry for the layout of this mail. It is written in a web mail
system...
The attachements are in ASCII format even if the web-mail make it base-64
Now I have compiled a vanilla 2.2.19 kernel and have SMP working, without
Ultra-DMA. I used the functional kernel config from 2.2
5 matches
Mail list logo
