Svenning Soerensen writes:
> Yes, I see your point. I guess I made an incorrect assumption about it
> being changed between reboots. It could be related to routing or something
> instead. I'll have to dig a bit further to find a pattern.
>
> However, even if I *do* find the pattern, I stil
Svenning Soerensen writes:
> I think there is a bug in the 2.4 icmp code regarding PMTU discovery.
> It seems to be inconsistent between reboots: at one boot echo replies always
> have the DF bit set, while after another boot they don't, indicating that
> this is caused by an uninitialized pa
Hi there,
I think there is a bug in the 2.4 icmp code regarding PMTU discovery.
It seems to be inconsistent between reboots: at one boot echo replies always
have the DF bit set, while after another boot they don't, indicating that
this is caused by an uninitialized parameter.
Even 'echo 1 > /proc
3 matches
Mail list logo
