Re: Possible memory leak in block/ll_rw_blk.c

2006-12-13 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
From: "Catalin Marinas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Possible memory leak in block/ll_rw_blk.c Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:00:05 + > On 09/12/06, Catalin Marinas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > unreferenced object 0xdd9162b0 (size 64): > > [] kmem_ca

Re: Possible memory leak in block/ll_rw_blk.c

2006-12-13 Thread Catalin Marinas
On 09/12/06, Catalin Marinas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: unreferenced object 0xdd9162b0 (size 64): [] kmem_cache_alloc [] mempool_alloc_slab [] mempool_alloc [] bio_alloc_bioset [] bio_alloc [] bio_copy_user [] __blk_rq_map_user [] blk_rq_map_user [] sg_io [] scsi_cmd_ioctl [

Possible memory leak in block/ll_rw_blk.c

2006-12-09 Thread Catalin Marinas
Hi, After 2.6.19, kmemleak reports several (few tens) orphan blocks allocated in bio_alloc_bioset() via __blk_rq_map_user() in block/ll_rq_blk.c. I think these came with commit 0e75f9063f5c55fb0b0b546a7c356f8ec186825e (support larger block pc requests). The allocation backtrace for the "bio" stru