Re: Patch to include/linux/kernel.h breaks 3rd party modules.

2016-12-22 Thread Petr Mladek
On Wed 2016-12-21 15:42:05, Valdis Kletnieks wrote: > Yes, I know that usually out-of-tree modules are on their own. > However, this one may require a rethink.. > > (Sorry for not catching this sooner, I hadn't tried to deal with the > affected module since this patch hit linux-next in next-201611

Re: Patch to include/linux/kernel.h breaks 3rd party modules.

2016-12-21 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 03:42:05PM -0500, Valdis Kletnieks wrote: > Yes, I know that usually out-of-tree modules are on their own. > However, this one may require a rethink.. > > (Sorry for not catching this sooner, I hadn't tried to deal with the > affected module since this patch hit linux-next

Re: Patch to include/linux/kernel.h breaks 3rd party modules.

2016-12-21 Thread Al Viro
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 03:42:05PM -0500, Valdis Kletnieks wrote: > Yes, I know that usually out-of-tree modules are on their own. > However, this one may require a rethink.. > > (Sorry for not catching this sooner, I hadn't tried to deal with the > affected module since this patch hit linux-next

Re: Patch to include/linux/kernel.h breaks 3rd party modules.

2016-12-21 Thread Jessica Yu
+++ Valdis Kletnieks [21/12/16 15:42 -0500]: Yes, I know that usually out-of-tree modules are on their own. However, this one may require a rethink.. (Sorry for not catching this sooner, I hadn't tried to deal with the affected module since this patch hit linux-next in next-20161128) commit 7fd

Patch to include/linux/kernel.h breaks 3rd party modules.

2016-12-21 Thread Valdis Kletnieks
Yes, I know that usually out-of-tree modules are on their own. However, this one may require a rethink.. (Sorry for not catching this sooner, I hadn't tried to deal with the affected module since this patch hit linux-next in next-20161128) commit 7fd8329ba502ef76dd91db561c7aed696b2c7720 Author: P