On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 09:54:26AM +0100, Mateusz Stępień wrote:
> Thank you for the quick response, unfortunately the patch does not work,
> problem still persist.
OK, I reproduced the bug.
> I saw the other mail thread, and it looks like the proper solution
> described by Al will take some ti
Thank you for the quick response, unfortunately the patch does not work,
problem still persist.
I saw the other mail thread, and it looks like the proper solution
described by Al will take some time. I don't know if we can afford right
now to write a proper patch ourselves, also at least my unde
On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 09:21:23AM +0100, Mateusz Stępień wrote:
> After changing network namespace using setns, the content of /proc/net
> still represents the original namespace.
> It looks like procfs dentries are not invalidated in dcache properly
> after the namespace switch.
> It happens on
Hello everyone,
After changing network namespace using setns, the content of /proc/net
still represents the original namespace.
It looks like procfs dentries are not invalidated in dcache properly
after the namespace switch.
It happens only, when you read content of /proc/net before changing
n
4 matches
Mail list logo