Re: PPC64 AT_IGNOREPPC question

2007-09-10 Thread Vitaly Mayatskikh
Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'll have to check when that change was done and decide whether we can > now take out the AT_IGNOREPPC entries. If not it sounds like we need > to expand AT_VECTOR_SIZE. I've looked over glibc-2.3 sources (is it old enough? :) and didn't notice any sp

Re: PPC64 AT_IGNOREPPC question

2007-09-09 Thread Paul Mackerras
Vitaly Mayatskikh writes: > include/asm-powerpc/elf.h:289 > > Why we need the second AT_IGNOREPPC entry here? > > There is a mm_struct->saved_auxv overflow on PPC64 with AT_VECTOR_SIZE > == 44 (may be on PPC32 too, not checked) when adding all entries to > it. I've removed the second AT_IGNOREPC

PPC64 AT_IGNOREPPC question

2007-09-07 Thread Vitaly Mayatskikh
include/asm-powerpc/elf.h:289 Why we need the second AT_IGNOREPPC entry here? There is a mm_struct->saved_auxv overflow on PPC64 with AT_VECTOR_SIZE == 44 (may be on PPC32 too, not checked) when adding all entries to it. I've removed the second AT_IGNOREPCC from ARCH_DLINFO to prevent overflowi