Re: PCI DAC DMA APIs

2007-03-15 Thread David Miller
From: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:18:34 + > On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 12:38:13PM +, Jan Beulich wrote: > > While the kernel headers provide for this, there don't appear to be any > > in-tree users (which seems contrary to general Linux policies). Would the

Re: PCI DAC DMA APIs

2007-03-15 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 12:38:13PM +, Jan Beulich wrote: > While the kernel headers provide for this, there don't appear to be any > in-tree users (which seems contrary to general Linux policies). Would there > be objections to remove all of these? They should go away. Having them in for more

Re: PCI DAC DMA APIs

2007-03-15 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Thursday, March 15, 2007 5:38 am Jan Beulich wrote: > While the kernel headers provide for this, there don't appear to be > any in-tree users (which seems contrary to general Linux policies). > Would there be objections to remove all of these? It should be safe to kill them, but I remember argu

Re: PCI DAC DMA APIs

2007-03-15 Thread Andi Kleen
On Thursday 15 March 2007 13:38, Jan Beulich wrote: > While the kernel headers provide for this, there don't appear to be any > in-tree users (which seems contrary to general Linux policies). Would there > be objections to remove all of these? Would be fine for me. I think the original idea was t

PCI DAC DMA APIs

2007-03-15 Thread Jan Beulich
While the kernel headers provide for this, there don't appear to be any in-tree users (which seems contrary to general Linux policies). Would there be objections to remove all of these? Jan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL