Re: [Jfs-discussion] Out of memory on 3.5 kernels

2012-11-27 Thread Nico Schottelius
Hey Dave, Dave Kleikamp [Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 09:56:58AM -0600]: > [...] > I believe this commit will fix the problem: > http://git.kernel.org/gitweb.cgi?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=4eff96d > > It is targeted for the stable kernels. Thanks, I'll give it a try, I've

Re: [Jfs-discussion] Out of memory on 3.5 kernels

2012-11-27 Thread Dave Kleikamp
On 11/21/2012 04:37 PM, Dave Kleikamp wrote: > On 10/30/2012 05:35 AM, Nico Schottelius wrote: >> Good morning, >> >> update: this problem still exists on 3.6.2-1-ARCH and it got worse: >> >> I reformatted the external disk to use xfs, but as the my >> root filesystem is still jfs, it still appears

Re: Out of memory on 3.5 kernels

2012-11-22 Thread Dave Kleikamp
On 10/30/2012 05:35 AM, Nico Schottelius wrote: > Good morning, > > update: this problem still exists on 3.6.2-1-ARCH and it got worse: > > I reformatted the external disk to use xfs, but as the my > root filesystem is still jfs, it still appears: > > Active / Total Objects (% used): 642732

Re: [Jfs-discussion] Out of memory on 3.5 kernels

2012-11-01 Thread Tino Reichardt
* Nico Schottelius wrote: > Good morning, > > update: this problem still exists on 3.6.2-1-ARCH and it got worse: > > I reformatted the external disk to use xfs, but as the my > root filesystem is still jfs, it still appears: > > Active / Total Objects (% used): 642732 / 692268 (92.8%) >

Re: Out of memory on 3.5 kernels

2012-10-30 Thread Nico Schottelius
Good morning, update: this problem still exists on 3.6.2-1-ARCH and it got worse: I reformatted the external disk to use xfs, but as the my root filesystem is still jfs, it still appears: Active / Total Objects (% used): 642732 / 692268 (92.8%) Active / Total Slabs (% used) : 24801 /

Re: Out of memory on 3.5 kernels

2012-10-05 Thread Nico Schottelius
Hey Valdis, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu [Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 11:48:04AM -0400]: > On Wed, 03 Oct 2012 23:23:11 +0200, Nico Schottelius said: > > > does anyone of you have a clue so far what may be causing the huge > > slab usage? > > > > I've just found an interesting detail: umounting and cryptsetu

Re: Out of memory on 3.5 kernels

2012-10-05 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Wed, 03 Oct 2012 23:23:11 +0200, Nico Schottelius said: > does anyone of you have a clue so far what may be causing the huge > slab usage? > > I've just found an interesting detail: umounting and cryptsetup > luksClosing frees up the used memory (not sure which one was freeing > up) For what i

Re: Out of memory on 3.5 kernels

2012-09-26 Thread Nico Schottelius
David Rientjes [Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 03:43:27PM -0700]: > [...] > > And those objects are consuming ~2.3GB of slab on your 4GB machine and > seems to only have occurred between v3.4.2 to v3.5.3. > > It would be interesting to see what kmemleak would tell us. As the Archlinux kernel does not

Re: Out of memory on 3.5 kernels

2012-09-26 Thread Nico Schottelius
Good morning, Dave Kleikamp [Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:07:14AM -0500]: > >> Active / Total Objects (% used): 1165130 / 1198087 (97.2%) > >> Active / Total Slabs (% used) : 81027 / 81027 (100.0%) > >> Active / Total Caches (% used) : 69 / 101 (68.3%) > >> Active / Total Size (% used)

Re: Out of memory on 3.5 kernels

2012-09-25 Thread Dave Kleikamp
On 09/24/2012 05:43 PM, David Rientjes wrote: > On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Nico Schottelius wrote: > >> Active / Total Objects (% used): 1165130 / 1198087 (97.2%) >> Active / Total Slabs (% used) : 81027 / 81027 (100.0%) >> Active / Total Caches (% used) : 69 / 101 (68.3%) >> Active / T

Re: Out of memory on 3.5 kernels

2012-09-24 Thread David Rientjes
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Nico Schottelius wrote: > Active / Total Objects (% used): 1165130 / 1198087 (97.2%) > Active / Total Slabs (% used) : 81027 / 81027 (100.0%) > Active / Total Caches (% used) : 69 / 101 (68.3%) > Active / Total Size (% used) : 1237249.81K / 1246521.94K (

Re: Out of memory on 3.5 kernels

2012-09-20 Thread Arend van Spriel
Thanks, Nico > just while running, I got the following brcmsmac related error: > > [17336.572558] WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/main.c:7968 brcms_c_wait_for_tx_completion+0x99/0xb0 [brcmsmac]() > [17336.572562] Hardware name: MacBookAir4,2 > [17336.572565] Modules linked

Re: Out of memory on 3.5 kernels

2012-09-20 Thread Nico Schottelius
Hey Arend, just while running, I got the following brcmsmac related error: [17336.572558] WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/main.c:7968 brcms_c_wait_for_tx_completion+0x99/0xb0 [brcmsmac]() [17336.572562] Hardware name: MacBookAir4,2 [17336.572565] Modules linked in: sha256_gen

Re: Out of memory on 3.5 kernels

2012-09-20 Thread Nico Schottelius
Hey Arend, Arend van Spriel [Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 09:44:18AM +0200]: > Hi Nico, > > Being curious (and suspicious) over here. Are you doing the rsync > over wireless interface using brcmsmac? I am currently looking at > bugzilla #47721 (see [1]) and maybe this is related. No, the rsync actually

Re: Out of memory on 3.5 kernels

2012-09-20 Thread Arend van Spriel
On 09/20/2012 09:32 AM, Nico Schottelius wrote: Hey David, David Rientjes [Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:54:54PM -0700]: >On Thu, 20 Sep 2012, Nico Schottelius wrote: > > >for some time the slab usage is quite high (~3.2 GiB) and whenever I try > >to do a backup with ccollect (which is using rsync),

Re: Out of memory on 3.5 kernels

2012-09-20 Thread Nico Schottelius
Hey David, David Rientjes [Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:54:54PM -0700]: > On Thu, 20 Sep 2012, Nico Schottelius wrote: > > > for some time the slab usage is quite high (~3.2 GiB) and whenever I try > > to do a backup with ccollect (which is using rsync), a lot of processes > > (like chromium) are bein

Re: Out of memory on 3.5 kernels

2012-09-19 Thread David Rientjes
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012, Nico Schottelius wrote: > for some time the slab usage is quite high (~3.2 GiB) and whenever I try > to do a backup with ccollect (which is using rsync), a lot of processes > (like chromium) are being killed over night. > Yeah, over 81% of your memory is consumed by slab and