I got a report from a user this morning with the following oops.
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0038 RIP:
[] iput+0x18/0x7b
PGD 6fdf9067 PUD 7810c067 PMD 0
Oops: [1] SMP
CPU 1
Modules linked in: berry_charge tun vfat fat usb_storage appletalk ipx p8023
i915
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 11:09:33AM +0300, Ville Herva wrote:
> Well, I for one use the 2.2 ide patches extensively (on almost all of my
> machines, including a heavy-duty backup server), and haven't seen any
> problems whatsoever. I see _much_ more problems with scsi (aic7xxx), for
> example.
I h
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 11:56:51AM +0100, you [Stephen C. Tweedie] claimed:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 11:09:33AM +0300, Ville Herva wrote:
>
> > Well, I for one use the 2.2 ide patches extensively (on almost all of my
> > machines, including a heavy-duty backup server)
>
> It is highly
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 11:09:33AM +0300, Ville Herva wrote:
> Well, I for one use the 2.2 ide patches extensively (on almost all of my
> machines, including a heavy-duty backup server)
It is highly hardware-dependent. A huge amount of effort was spent
early in 2.4 getting blacklists and h
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 07:42:13PM +0100, you [Stephen C. Tweedie] claimed:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 08:16:12PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> >
> > oops in iput - Kernel 2.2.19/i386 + ide-udma patches + ext3 patches (0.0.7a)
>
> The ide-udma patches for
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 08:16:12PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
>
> oops in iput - Kernel 2.2.19/i386 + ide-udma patches + ext3 patches (0.0.7a)
The ide-udma patches for 2.2 haven't had nearly the testing of the 2.4
ones, and simply can't be trusted as a baseline for debu
Hi,
oops in iput - Kernel 2.2.19/i386 + ide-udma patches + ext3 patches (0.0.7a)
Intel BX chipset, SCSI Disks Symbios chipset - The crashing process
is the master process of "postfix" an MTA.
Just before the crash all processes on that machine started to segfault
in nameserver
7 matches
Mail list logo
