ric FINCO ;
> Russell Wayman ; Matthew Locke
> ; Kumar Gala ; Bill
> Fletcher ; Puja Gupta ;
> Ohad Ben-Cohen
> Subject: Re: Ongoing remoteproc discussions
>
> On Wed 10 Aug 17:19 PDT 2016, Suman Anna wrote:
>
> > Hi Bjorn,
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> > On
On Thu 11 Aug 09:48 PDT 2016, Suman Anna wrote:
> On 08/10/2016 03:22 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Wed 03 Aug 07:52 PDT 2016, Loic PALLARDY wrote:
> >
> >>> == Auto-boot or always-on:
> > [..]
> >>>
> >> [LPA] As already mentioned in patch review, I would prefer auto-boot
> >> name rather th
On Wed 10 Aug 17:19 PDT 2016, Suman Anna wrote:
> Hi Bjorn,
>
Hi,
> On 07/18/2016 06:10 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
[..]
> > == Auto-boot or always-on:
> > There are cases where we want to achieve the current auto-boot mechanism
> > without rpmsg and there are cases where we don't want to auto-b
On 08/10/2016 03:22 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Wed 03 Aug 07:52 PDT 2016, Loic PALLARDY wrote:
>
>>> == Auto-boot or always-on:
> [..]
>>>
>> [LPA] As already mentioned in patch review, I would prefer auto-boot
>> name rather than always-on for this feature.
>
> Agreed.
>
>> What about copr
Hi Bjorn,
On 07/18/2016 06:10 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> During discussions with various people interested in moving their
> remoteproc-related out-of-tree patches towards mainline I have come
> across a set of topics common among various teams. The purpose of this
> email is to share some insig
On Wed 03 Aug 07:52 PDT 2016, Loic PALLARDY wrote:
> > == Auto-boot or always-on:
[..]
> >
> [LPA] As already mentioned in patch review, I would prefer auto-boot
> name rather than always-on for this feature.
Agreed.
> What about coprocessor already loaded and started at boot stage? It
> may be
;
> Sarangdhar Joshi ; Loic PALLARDY
> ; Eric FINCO ; Russell Wayman
> ; Matthew Locke ;
> Kumar Gala ; Bill Fletcher ;
> Puja Gupta ; Ohad Ben-Cohen
> ; Suman Anna
> Subject: Ongoing remoteproc discussions
>
> During discussions with various people interested in mov
On Mon 25 Jul 05:26 PDT 2016, Peter Griffin wrote:
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2016, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>
> > During discussions with various people interested in moving their
> > remoteproc-related out-of-tree patches towards mainline I have come
> > across a set of topics common among v
Hi Bjorn,
On Mon, 18 Jul 2016, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> During discussions with various people interested in moving their
> remoteproc-related out-of-tree patches towards mainline I have come
> across a set of topics common among various teams. The purpose of this
> email is to share some insight
During discussions with various people interested in moving their
remoteproc-related out-of-tree patches towards mainline I have come
across a set of topics common among various teams. The purpose of this
email is to share some insight into these discussions and the current
ideas for moving forward
10 matches
Mail list logo
