On 14/05/15 23:12, Doug Smythies wrote:
> On 2015.05.14 10:48 Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
>> * Juri Lelli wrote:
On 14/05/15 15:41, Doug Smythies wrote:
As of, or about, Kernel 4.1RC1 on resume from suspend only CPU 0 comes
back on-line.
The issue persists through Kernel 4.1RC3.
>>>
* Doug Smythies wrote:
> On 2015.05.14 10:48 Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > * Juri Lelli wrote:
> >>> On 14/05/15 15:41, Doug Smythies wrote:
> >>> As of, or about, Kernel 4.1RC1 on resume from suspend only CPU 0 comes
> >>> back on-line.
> >>> The issue persists through Kernel 4.1RC3.
> >>> This i
On 2015.05.14 10:48 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Juri Lelli wrote:
>>> On 14/05/15 15:41, Doug Smythies wrote:
>>> As of, or about, Kernel 4.1RC1 on resume from suspend only CPU 0 comes back
>>> on-line.
>>> The issue persists through Kernel 4.1RC3.
>>> This is on my test computer with an i7-2600K.
>>
* Juri Lelli wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> On 14/05/15 15:41, Doug Smythies wrote:
> > As of, or about, Kernel 4.1RC1 on resume from suspend only CPU 0 comes back
> > on-line.
> > The issue persists through Kernel 4.1RC3.
> > This is on my test computer with an i7-2600K.
> > I do not normally use susp
Hi Doug,
On 14/05/15 15:41, Doug Smythies wrote:
> As of, or about, Kernel 4.1RC1 on resume from suspend only CPU 0 comes back
> on-line.
> The issue persists through Kernel 4.1RC3.
> This is on my test computer with an i7-2600K.
> I do not normally use suspend on this computer, but was doing so
As of, or about, Kernel 4.1RC1 on resume from suspend only CPU 0 comes back
on-line.
The issue persists through Kernel 4.1RC3.
This is on my test computer with an i7-2600K.
I do not normally use suspend on this computer, but was doing so while working
on a bug report.
The kernel was bisected, an
6 matches
Mail list logo