Re: New bluesmoke patch available, implements MCE-without-MCA support

2000-11-16 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
> I would appreciate it if people who have chips with MCE but no MCA -- > this includes older AMD chips and some Cyrix chips at the very least > -- would please be so kind and try this out. Hmm, I've looked at the patch and I guess you may try to decode MSR#0 and MSR#1 for Pentium processors (I

Re: New bluesmoke patch available, implements MCE-without-MCA support

2000-11-15 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Mikael Pettersson wrote: > > On 15 Nov 2000, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > >This implements support for MCE on chips which don't support MCA (in > >addition to enabling MCA for non-Intel chips, like Athlon, which > >supports MCA.) > > > >I would appreciate it if people who have chips with MCE but no

Re: New bluesmoke patch available, implements MCE-without-MCA support

2000-11-15 Thread Mikael Pettersson
On 15 Nov 2000, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >This implements support for MCE on chips which don't support MCA (in >addition to enabling MCA for non-Intel chips, like Athlon, which >supports MCA.) > >I would appreciate it if people who have chips with MCE but no MCA -- >this includes older AMD chips and

Re: New bluesmoke patch available, implements MCE-without-MCA support

2000-11-15 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Followup to: <8uuvnk$1v8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> By author:"H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > Hi everyone, > > I have just released a second bluesmoke patch: > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/hpa/bluesmoke-2.4.0-test11-pre5-2.diff > > This imp

New bluesmoke patch available, implements MCE-without-MCA support

2000-11-15 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Hi everyone, I have just released a second bluesmoke patch: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/hpa/bluesmoke-2.4.0-test11-pre5-2.diff This implements support for MCE on chips which don't support MCA (in addition to enabling MCA for non-Intel chips, like Athlon, which supports MCA.) I