Re: NUMA processor numbering

2013-10-03 Thread Brice Goglin
Le 03/10/2013 12:46, Stephan von Krawczynski a écrit : > Ok, let me re-phrase the question a bit. > Is it really possible what you see here: > > processor : 0 > vendor_id : GenuineIntel > cpu family : 6 > model : 45 > model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 0 @ 2.2

Re: NUMA processor numbering

2013-10-03 Thread Stephan von Krawczynski
On Thu, 3 Oct 2013 07:22:55 -0300 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Thu, 03 Oct 2013, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > > Does the above output mean that the cores are numbered right across the two > > physical cpus? Does this mean one has to pin processes to 0,2,4,... to stay > > in > > "s

Re: NUMA processor numbering

2013-10-03 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Thu, 03 Oct 2013, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > Does the above output mean that the cores are numbered right across the two > physical cpus? Does this mean one has to pin processes to 0,2,4,... to stay in > "short distance" to node 0 RAM? ... > If so, it would be a lot better to have them n

NUMA processor numbering

2013-10-03 Thread Stephan von Krawczynski
Hello all, I have a box with this kind of processor (0-31) and 128 GB RAM: processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 45 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 0 @ 2.20GHz stepping: 7 microcode : 0x70d cpu MHz : 2486.000